From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Olivier Hanesse <olivier.hanesse@gmail.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Eelco Dolstra <e.dolstra@tudelft.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/pvclock-xen: zero last_value on resume
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 14:29:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CF034D4.70005@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101126104047.GA9798@elte.hu>
On 11/26/2010 02:40 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
>
>> On 10/26/2010 09:59 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>> If the guest domain has been suspend/resumed or migrated, then the
>>> system clock backing the pvclock clocksource may revert to a smaller
>>> value (ie, can be non-monotonic across the migration/save-restore).
>>> Make sure we zero last_value in that case so that the domain
>>> continues to see clock updates.
>> Ping? Looks like this fell through the gaps.
> Does not apply cleanly here - mind resending the latest version?
It rebased cleanly to 2.6.37-rc3. You can pull it from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git pvclock-resume
Jeremy Fitzhardinge (1):
x86/pvclock: zero last_value on resume
arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c | 5 +++++
arch/x86/xen/time.c | 2 ++
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Thanks,
J
Subject: [PATCH] x86/pvclock: zero last_value on resume
If the guest domain has been suspend/resumed or migrated, then the
system clock backing the pvclock clocksource may revert to a smaller
value (ie, can be non-monotonic across the migration/save-restore).
Make sure we zero last_value in that case so that the domain
continues to see clock updates.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock.h
index 7f7e577..31d84ac 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock.h
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ unsigned long pvclock_tsc_khz(struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *src);
void pvclock_read_wallclock(struct pvclock_wall_clock *wall,
struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *vcpu,
struct timespec *ts);
+void pvclock_resume(void);
/*
* Scale a 64-bit delta by scaling and multiplying by a 32-bit fraction,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c b/arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c
index 008b91e..42eb330 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c
@@ -83,6 +83,11 @@ unsigned long pvclock_tsc_khz(struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *src)
static atomic64_t last_value = ATOMIC64_INIT(0);
+void pvclock_resume(void)
+{
+ atomic64_set(&last_value, 0);
+}
+
cycle_t pvclock_clocksource_read(struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *src)
{
struct pvclock_shadow_time shadow;
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/time.c b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
index b2bb5aa..5da5e53 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/time.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
@@ -426,6 +426,8 @@ void xen_timer_resume(void)
{
int cpu;
+ pvclock_resume();
+
if (xen_clockevent != &xen_vcpuop_clockevent)
return;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-26 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-26 16:59 [PATCH] x86/pvclock-xen: zero last_value on resume Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-10-26 17:48 ` Glauber Costa
2010-10-27 18:53 ` [Xen-devel] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-10-27 20:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-11-03 12:46 ` Ian Campbell
2010-11-22 20:16 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-11-26 10:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-26 22:29 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CF034D4.70005@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=e.dolstra@tudelft.nl \
--cc=glommer@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=olivier.hanesse@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).