From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com>
To: Allen M Kay <allen.m.kay@intel.com>,
Yang Z Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Weidong Han <weidong.han@intel.com>
Subject: RE: iommu=0 leading to panic when system defaults to using x2apic
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 08:21:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D07372F0200007800027BBF@vpn.id2.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <987664A83D2D224EAE907B061CE93D530193BB9EB8@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
>>> On 10.12.10 at 19:26, "Kay, Allen M" <allen.m.kay@intel.com> wrote:
> The architectural requirement is actually between interrupt remapping and
> x2apic. Since interrupt remapping is part of the VT-d feature so current
> software requires all VT-d features enabled in order for x2apic to be enabled.
>
> Strictly speaking DMA remapping is not required for x2apic. However, queued
> invalidation is required since interrupt remapping requires queued
> invalidation. So x2apic dependency is as follows:
>
> x2apic->interrupt remapping->queued invalidation
>
> Due to historical reasons, the new VT-d features were built on top of the old
> ones as they become available. Is there a requirement to separate this out?
> If so, we will need to re-design iommu boot parameter which took a while to
> get it right so most systems can now boot successfully.
And why is it that Xen panics when the BIOS pre-enabled x2apic
mode without also enabling interrupt re-mapping, while Linux
(afaict from looking at 2.6.32 code and output from an affected
machine) simply enables interrupt re-mapping in this case?
Thanks, Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-14 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-10 9:12 iommu=0 leading to panic when system defaults to using x2apic Jan Beulich
2010-12-10 10:06 ` Keir Fraser
2010-12-10 10:58 ` Jan Beulich
2010-12-10 11:47 ` Keir Fraser
2010-12-10 12:02 ` Jan Beulich
2010-12-10 15:00 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2010-12-10 15:39 ` Jan Beulich
2010-12-10 18:26 ` Kay, Allen M
2010-12-10 18:49 ` Keir Fraser
2010-12-11 0:07 ` Kay, Allen M
2010-12-13 8:15 ` Jan Beulich
2010-12-13 9:03 ` Keir Fraser
2010-12-14 2:25 ` Kay, Allen M
2010-12-14 7:44 ` Keir Fraser
2010-12-14 7:59 ` Keir Fraser
2010-12-15 2:35 ` Kay, Allen M
2010-12-14 8:21 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2010-12-14 8:46 ` Weidong Han
2010-12-14 9:12 ` Jan Beulich
2010-12-14 16:53 ` Kay, Allen M
2010-12-14 17:06 ` Jan Beulich
2010-12-14 17:08 ` Jan Beulich
2010-12-14 17:52 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-14 18:18 ` Keir Fraser
2010-12-15 7:53 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D07372F0200007800027BBF@vpn.id2.novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=allen.m.kay@intel.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=weidong.han@intel.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).