From: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@novell.com>
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Berthold Gunreben <bg@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xend: drbd improvements
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:45:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D0AB298.4080202@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CDADB46.7020100@novell.com>
Jim Fehlig wrote:
> Jim Fehlig wrote:
>
>> Ian Jackson wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Jim Fehlig writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH] xend: drbd improvements"):
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> xend: drbd improvements
>>>>
>>>> 1) drbdadm state is debrecated, and the script tries to detect the
>>>> primary/secondary information from the deprecated message
>>>> 2) os.popen2 does not work with the array as argument
>>>> 3) popen2 is deprecated since python2.6
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Forgive my ignorance, but: why does xend need to mess with drbd at
>>> all ? Why can't it just open the block device ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Good question. I too was surprised to see special casing of drbd within
>> xend. Seems c/s 20158 added this code to allow bootloaders (pygrub,
>> domUloader, et. al.) to work with drbd devices using the 'drbd:resource'
>> syntax. Perhaps the author of that patch (cc'd) can provide more
>> details.
>>
>
> The patch author's mail address is no longer valid, so we won't be
> receiving any feedback from him :-(.
>
Sorry for the delay here, but I finally got around to investigating this
further. As it turns out, drbd's block-drbd script handles all of the
details that c/s 20158 introduces within xend :-(. IMO, this c/s should
be reverted as it causes a regression. I've tested drbd without this
changeset and it works fine.
Regards,
Jim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-17 0:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-09 17:50 [PATCH] xend: drbd improvements Jim Fehlig
2010-11-09 18:26 ` Ian Jackson
2010-11-09 22:21 ` Jim Fehlig
2010-11-10 17:49 ` Jim Fehlig
2010-12-17 0:45 ` Jim Fehlig [this message]
2010-12-17 0:58 ` Shriram Rajagopalan
2010-12-17 3:46 ` Jim Fehlig
2011-01-05 23:32 ` Ian Jackson
2011-01-06 17:48 ` Shriram Rajagopalan
2011-01-10 23:31 ` Jim Fehlig
2011-01-13 3:38 ` Jim Fehlig
2011-01-13 7:36 ` Shriram Rajagopalan
2011-01-13 11:45 ` Ian Jackson
2011-01-13 15:59 ` Jim Fehlig
2011-01-18 17:24 ` Ian Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D0AB298.4080202@novell.com \
--to=jfehlig@novell.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=bg@suse.de \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).