From: Zhiyuan Shao <zyshao.maillist@gmail.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: Questions regarding Xen Credit Scheduler
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 22:25:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D0B72F1.3080605@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTiloe7jgMO49i72sF0MDFmuHJJeysEBb0oLVNono@mail.gmail.com>
In your case, I think, you can try Boost-Credit. Your I/O intensive
domain will benefit for that.
Best,
Zhiyuan
On 07/09/2010 05:14 AM, Gaurav Dhiman wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am using Xen 3.3.2 for some of my experiments, and have been
> consistently observing some sub-optimal results in our experiments
> with latency sensitive I/O intensive and compute bound VMs running
> together on a physical machine. We are observing latency issues in
> cases with enough CPU resources available for both the VMs to co-exist
> well, even if we give much higher weight to the latency sensitive VM.
> I suspect it is due to the way the Xen credit scheduler works. In this
> context, I have some questions regarding the scheduler:
>
> 1) In the sched_acct function, the credit cap is set to 300, enough to
> survive one time slice. But if some VCPU crosses that cap, it is set
> to 0, and marked inactive. Why is there no concept of a ceiling (like
> that of a floor for the VCPUs going over the credit line), i.e. why is
> it not set to 300? Is there some fundamental reason for setting it to
> 0? I believe this is resulting in a lot of times when our latency
> sensitive VCPUs have to wait for maybe a time slice, when they can
> immediately run. This might happen if they run with BOOST priority and
> get interrupted by a timer tick, which takes that priority away.
>
> 2) Why is the runq sorted by just priority (which is very coarse
> grained: BOOST, UNDER and OVER), and not the credit? This can result
> in VCPUs with higher credit getting starved for CPU if we have batch
> and latency sensitive VCPUs in the system.
>
> 3) Is there some patch, which makes the current credit scheduler
> fairer to the latency sensitive VCPUs? I see that the sched_credit2
> scheduler addresses these issues, but right now it has just one global
> runq and no load balancing features.
>
> Any advice/inputs here will be extremely valuable!
>
> Thanks in advance,
> -Gaurav
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-17 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-08 21:14 Questions regarding Xen Credit Scheduler Gaurav Dhiman
2010-07-09 12:13 ` George Dunlap
2010-07-10 9:21 ` Gaurav Dhiman
2010-07-12 11:05 ` George Dunlap
2010-07-16 0:41 ` Gaurav Dhiman
2010-07-16 9:13 ` George Dunlap
2010-07-16 11:04 ` George Dunlap
2010-12-17 14:23 ` Does Xen-4.0 + pvops kernel still supports PV guest? Zhiyuan Shao
2010-12-17 14:36 ` Ian Campbell
2010-12-17 14:51 ` Zhiyuan Shao
2010-12-17 15:07 ` Ian Campbell
2010-12-17 14:25 ` Zhiyuan Shao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D0B72F1.3080605@gmail.com \
--to=zyshao.maillist@gmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).