From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: vscsi 2TB patches Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 16:26:59 +0000 Message-ID: <4D2C92E3020000780002BC3F@vpn.id2.novell.com> References: <4D222D71.9020508@list.ims.co.at><20110103230621.GP2754@reaktio.net><4D230357.3070604@list.ims.co.at><4D2316D5020000780002A2F1@vpn.id2.novell.com><4D231AA0.8060500@list.ims.co.at><4D2329BA020000780002A32F@vpn.id2.novell.com> <4D231F6C.50309@list.ims.co.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4D231F6C.50309@list.ims.co.at> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: kama@jp.fujitsu.com, t.horikoshi@jp.fujitsu.com Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Samuel Kvasnica List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> On 04.01.11 at 14:23, Samuel Kvasnica = wrote: > On 01/04/2011 02:07 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> I wasn't actually after the printk(), but rather noticing your original >> scsifront patch apparently consisted of only an added comment; >> that I was wrong with actually (not being used to read non-unified >> diffs), but your newer patch still contains a number of apparently >> arbitrary newline insertions and removals. >=20 > is this ok now ? Tomonari, Jun, any word on these changes? Thanks, Jan