From: Jean Baptiste Favre <xen-devel@jbfavre.org>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: PCI passthrough issue
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:56:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D2DDD4D.9090503@jbfavre.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110112163647.GB10863@dumpdata.com>
Le 12/01/2011 17:36, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk a écrit :
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 04:53:51PM +0100, Jean Baptiste Favre wrote:
>> Hello Konrad,
>>
>> Le 12/01/2011 16:43, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk a écrit :
>>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 04:38:49PM +0100, Jean Baptiste Favre wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>> I'm facing a strange issue with network card PCI passthrough on my
>>>> openwrt test domU.
>>>>
>>>> - With network PCI passthrough, DNS lookup failed for some domains
>>>> (exemple, google.com) but not for other (free.fr my ISP, or my domain
>>>> jbfavre.org). I can ping an IP address without any problem.
>>>
>>> Do you have "both" (so PCI passthrough and the Xen network driver)
>>> in the guest? If so, have you tried eliminating the xen network driver
>>> to see if it is just a routing issue?
>> Have not tried to eliminate xen network driver. Think I have both drivers.
>>
>> My kernel .config looks like:
>> $ grep XEN build_dir/linux-x86_xen_domu/linux-2.6.37/.config
>> CONFIG_XEN=y
>> # CONFIG_XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST is not set
>> CONFIG_XEN_PVHVM=y
>> CONFIG_XEN_MAX_DOMAIN_MEMORY=128
>> CONFIG_XEN_SAVE_RESTORE=y
>> CONFIG_PCI_XEN=y
>> CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_FRONTEND=y
>> CONFIG_XEN_BLKDEV_FRONTEND=y
>> CONFIG_XEN_NETDEV_FRONTEND=y
>> CONFIG_HVC_XEN=y
>> CONFIG_XEN_BALLOON=y
>> CONFIG_XEN_SCRUB_PAGES=y
>> CONFIG_XEN_DEV_EVTCHN=y
>> CONFIG_XENFS=y
>> CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_XENFS=y
>> CONFIG_XEN_SYS_HYPERVISOR=y
>> # CONFIG_XEN_PLATFORM_PCI is not set
>> CONFIG_SWIOTLB_XEN=y
>>
>> So, I should remove CONFIG_XEN_NETDEV_FRONTEND ?
>
> No. You can just do 'ifconfig <x> down' whatever your Xen netfront
> NIC is. .. but.
>>
>>> What does your routing table look like? Your IP table?
>> My routing table is pretty clean, nothing strange here
>> # route -n
>> Kernel IP routing table
>> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
>> Iface
>> 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
>> br-wan
>> 0.0.0.0 10.0.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
>> br-wan
>
> Ok, then the idea that the Xen networking driver and the PCI passthrough send
> packets over is not the way..
>
> So ignore about the Xen networking part.
OK.
>>
>>>> - Starting domU as a "normal" (ie without PCI passthrough), no problem.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As far as I can say, domU is not the root cause. I really think this is
>>>> related to PCI passsthrough. This seems to be related to packet length.
>>>
>>> Then that would imply the MTU is not set right.
>> Already checked it: 1500 :)
> Ok.
>
> Next thing, did you try to disable the rx/tx checksumming?
No. Not sure I even know how to do it, but will have a look on that.
> If you connect the Ethernet cable for this 'br-wan' device to another machine
> (so you could set it up as bridge and just let it pass through packets and sniff
> the data) what do the packets look like?
I can see packets on my gateway (which acts as DNS as well). They looks
good. I can see DNS answers as well leaving the gateway, but not
reaching my domU. Have only basic switches between my gateway and my domU.
> What happens if the PCI passthrough device is not under the ownership of a bridge?
> What then? You wouldn't have any bridge firewall code in?
Removed bridge + configure eth: no change.
Checked ebtables/iptables (all tables: net filter and mangle) rules:
empty, Policy to ACCEPT.
Tried to enable/disable ip_forwarding: no change
Also disabled IPV6 support (I saw some DNS answers as AAAA but no IPv6
available at home for now): no change
Regards,
JB
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-12 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-12 15:38 PCI passthrough issue Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 15:43 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-12 15:53 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 16:09 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 16:36 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-12 16:56 ` Jean Baptiste Favre [this message]
2011-01-12 17:26 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-12 17:44 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 18:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-12 20:07 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 21:40 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-12 21:46 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 22:18 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-13 11:28 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-13 19:18 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-13 20:19 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-13 20:44 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-14 14:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-14 23:29 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-17 8:59 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-17 13:58 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-22 10:22 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-27 20:27 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-27 21:47 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-28 15:47 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 11:34 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-01 12:17 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 13:20 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-01 14:12 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 14:18 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-01 15:14 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 15:38 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 16:23 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-01 19:37 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-01 22:06 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-02 9:12 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-01 23:01 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-02 9:44 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-02 15:38 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-02 15:55 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-02 15:56 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 22:04 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-02 9:27 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-02 10:24 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-02 10:59 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-02 11:33 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-02 17:42 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-04 8:43 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-04 8:53 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-04 8:54 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-04 10:12 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-04 11:04 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-04 11:25 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-04 11:28 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-04 13:15 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-04 13:50 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-04 14:01 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-09 9:59 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-18 21:14 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-25 14:40 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-28 10:00 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-28 12:18 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-28 15:01 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-28 15:17 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
[not found] ` <4D6CB851.40103@jbfavre.org>
2011-03-03 22:12 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-03 22:47 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-03-03 22:58 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-04 7:25 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-03-16 3:14 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-25 13:06 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 15:38 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-01 16:16 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 21:44 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D2DDD4D.9090503@jbfavre.org \
--to=xen-devel@jbfavre.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).