xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean Baptiste Favre <xen-devel@jbfavre.org>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: PCI passthrough issue
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 00:01:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D4890CD.7080009@jbfavre.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110201193743.GA18656@dumpdata.com>

Le 01/02/2011 20:37, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk a écrit :
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 04:23:09PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 15:38 +0000, Jean Baptiste Favre wrote:
>>> OK, just found it:
>>> after domU boot:
>>> - log in
>>> - ping -s 86 10.0.0.1 (fails)
>>> - rmmod sky2
>>> - modprobe sky2 copybreak=0 (no packet copied)
>>> - ping -s 86 10.0.0.1 (works)
>>>
>>> So it's clearly related to that option.
>>
>> Awesome!
>>
>>> Now the question: what am I supposed to do ?
>>
>> I think the next step is to try and reproduce on native 32 bit, with RAM
>> artificially limited via the mem= kernel command in option, this will
>> let us determine if this is a generic issue or is somehow Xen specific.
>>
>> The main difference caused by the copybreak option is that for larger
>> frames (i.e. always when copybreak==0) it hits a code path which uses
>> pci_map_single and pci_map_page to access the received data. When len <
>> copybreak it takes a path which uses pci_dma_sync_single_for_cpu, so it
>> seems like the later path is broken somehow. If the issue does turn out
> 
> It could also have gotten the direction reverted (the 3c5XX code had it
> wrong at some point so..). Might make sense to compile the kernel with
> CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG  which is good at detecting these issues.
> 
>> to be related to Xen then I think that points to the swiotlb code.
> 
>>
>> I assume you are not seeing "rx mapping error" in your domU dmesg? Did
>> you post a full guest console log at some point? Comparing the logs for
>> the 256MB, 398MB and 512MB guest RAM case might be useful.
>>
>> Konrad, is there some way to force swiotlb use even for native to make
>> the native test cases more relevant? Or is there some other direction we
> 
> swiotlb=force will do it.
OK, just performed native test.
Installed 32bits Debian Squeeze, add 2.6.37 32bits kernel from
experimental, setup grub with following options:
"mem=256M swiotlb=force"

Ping tests work whatever can be packet size.

If I understood well what you explain to me, it's now clear that the
problem is somewhat Xen related, isn't it ?

I'll be able to continue any tests you want tomorrow.
Do you still need me to compile domU kernel with "CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG"
enabled ?
If so, what tools will I need to get debug informations ?

Now, it's time to sleep here in France :) (or I'll get killed by my girl
friend :D )

Regards,
JB

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-02-01 23:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-12 15:38 PCI passthrough issue Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 15:43 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-12 15:53   ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 16:09     ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 16:36     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-12 16:56       ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 17:26         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-12 17:44           ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 18:32             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-12 20:07               ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 21:40                 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-12 21:46                   ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 22:18                     ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-13 11:28                       ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-13 19:18                         ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-13 20:19                           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-13 20:44                             ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-14 14:53                               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-14 23:29                                 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-17  8:59                                   ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-17 13:58                                     ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-22 10:22                                       ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-27 20:27                                         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-27 21:47                                           ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-28 15:47                                             ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 11:34                                               ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-01 12:17                                                 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 13:20                                                   ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-01 14:12                                                     ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 14:18                                                       ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-01 15:14                                                         ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 15:38                                                           ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 16:23                                                             ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-01 19:37                                                               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-01 22:06                                                                 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-02  9:12                                                                   ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-01 23:01                                                                 ` Jean Baptiste Favre [this message]
2011-02-02  9:44                                                                   ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-02 15:38                                                                     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-02 15:55                                                                       ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-02 15:56                                                                       ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 22:04                                                               ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-02  9:27                                                                 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-02 10:24                                                                   ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-02 10:59                                                                     ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-02 11:33                                                                       ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-02 17:42                                                                     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-04  8:43                                                                       ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-04  8:53                                                                         ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-04  8:54                                                                           ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-04 10:12                                                                             ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-04 11:04                                                                               ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-04 11:25                                                                                 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-04 11:28                                                                                   ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-04 13:15                                                                                     ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-04 13:50                                                                                       ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-04 14:01                                                                                         ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-09  9:59                                                                                           ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-18 21:14                                                                                             ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-25 14:40                                                                                               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-28 10:00                                                                                                 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-28 12:18                                                                                                 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-28 15:01                                                                                                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-28 15:17                                                                                                     ` Jean Baptiste Favre
     [not found]                                                                                                       ` <4D6CB851.40103@jbfavre.org>
2011-03-03 22:12                                                                                                         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-03 22:47                                                                                                           ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-03-03 22:58                                                                                                             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-04  7:25                                                                                                               ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-03-16  3:14                                                                                                                 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-25 13:06                                                                                                                   ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 15:38                                                           ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-01 16:16                                                             ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 21:44                 ` Jean Baptiste Favre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D4890CD.7080009@jbfavre.org \
    --to=xen-devel@jbfavre.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).