From: Jean Baptiste Favre <xen-devel@jbfavre.org>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: PCI passthrough issue
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 12:25:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D4BE212.1090400@jbfavre.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1296817460.13091.646.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Hello,
Le 04/02/2011 12:04, Ian Campbell a écrit :
> On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 10:12 +0000, Jean Baptiste Favre wrote:
>> Hello Ian,
>> Applyed your patches.
>
> Thanks.
>
>> Now, I've:
>> # ping -s86 10.0.0.1
>> PING 10.0.0.1 (10.0.0.1): 86 data bytes
>> __netif_receive_skb dropping skb proto 0x20
>>
>>
>> So problem seems to occur in net/core/dev.c file, according to the patch
>> bellow
>
> Interesting. the number printed in the warning is type == skb->protocol
> == 0x20 which is not a valid protocol that I can find anywhere (nor is
> 0x2000 in case I'm mixing my endianesses up). Neither is 0x20 it a valid
> Ethernet frame length (min 64) so it's not that sort of confusion
> AFAICT.
>
> skb->protocol is initialised in sky2_status_intr with the return value
> of "eth_type_trans(skb, dev)" which as far as I can tell cannot return
> 0x20.
>
> The domU network configuration is using the sky2 device directly, no
> bridging, VLAN, tunnels or anything else like that?
At boot it uses bridge.
For the test, I delete bridge and set IP address directly on eth0
root@OpenWrt:/# ifconfig br-lan down
br-lan: port 1(eth0) entering forwarding state
root@OpenWrt:/# brctl delbr br-lan
device eth0 left promiscuous mode
br-lan: port 1(eth0) entering disabled state
root@OpenWrt:/# ifconfig eth0 10.0.0.8 netmask 255.255.255.0
root@OpenWrt:/# ping 10.0.0.1
PING 10.0.0.1 (10.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: seq=0 ttl=64 time=10.455 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.870 ms
^C
--- 10.0.0.1 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 0.870/5.662/10.455 ms
root@OpenWrt:/# ping -s86 10.0.0.1
PING 10.0.0.1 (10.0.0.1): 86 data bytes
^C
--- 10.0.0.1 ping statistics ---
12 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
>
> Please can you post the output of "ethtool -k <sky2-device>".
root@OpenWrt:/# ethtool -k eth0
Offload parameters for eth0:
rx-checksumming: on
tx-checksumming: on
scatter-gather: on
tcp-segmentation-offload: on
udp-fragmentation-offload: off
generic-segmentation-offload: on
generic-receive-offload: on
large-receive-offload: off
ntuple-filters: off
receive-hashing: on
> If either tx or rx checksumming are enabled please can you try disabling
> them ("ethtool -K <sky2-device> [tx|rx] off"). This setting controls the
> code path in sky2_skb_rx which can go either to netif_receive_skb or
> napi_gro_receive.
root@OpenWrt:/# ethtool -K eth0 tx off
root@OpenWrt:/# ethtool -K eth0 rx off
root@OpenWrt:/# ping -s86 10.0.0.1
PING 10.0.0.1 (10.0.0.1): 86 data bytes
^C
--- 10.0.0.1 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
root@OpenWrt:/# ethtool -k eth0
Offload parameters for eth0:
rx-checksumming: off
tx-checksumming: off
scatter-gather: off
tcp-segmentation-offload: off
udp-fragmentation-offload: off
generic-segmentation-offload: on
generic-receive-offload: off
large-receive-offload: off
ntuple-filters: off
receive-hashing: on
> The tcpdump captures from both ends would still be interesting to see.
>
> The following patch enhances the previous one with a few checks for
> protocol 0x20 getting set.
>
> Ian.
What is a bit strange here is that I don't any more the KERN_CRIT printk
message.
Could be a false positive ?
I'm currently compiling new kernel with your last patch. will keep you
updated
Regards,
JB
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-04 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-12 15:38 PCI passthrough issue Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 15:43 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-12 15:53 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 16:09 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 16:36 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-12 16:56 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 17:26 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-12 17:44 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 18:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-12 20:07 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 21:40 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-12 21:46 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 22:18 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-13 11:28 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-13 19:18 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-13 20:19 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-13 20:44 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-14 14:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-14 23:29 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-17 8:59 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-17 13:58 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-22 10:22 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-27 20:27 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-27 21:47 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-28 15:47 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 11:34 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-01 12:17 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 13:20 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-01 14:12 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 14:18 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-01 15:14 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 15:38 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 16:23 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-01 19:37 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-01 22:06 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-02 9:12 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-01 23:01 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-02 9:44 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-02 15:38 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-02 15:55 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-02 15:56 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 22:04 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-02 9:27 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-02 10:24 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-02 10:59 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-02 11:33 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-02 17:42 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-04 8:43 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-04 8:53 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-04 8:54 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-04 10:12 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-04 11:04 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-04 11:25 ` Jean Baptiste Favre [this message]
2011-02-04 11:28 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-04 13:15 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-04 13:50 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-04 14:01 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-09 9:59 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-18 21:14 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-25 14:40 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-28 10:00 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-28 12:18 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-28 15:01 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-28 15:17 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
[not found] ` <4D6CB851.40103@jbfavre.org>
2011-03-03 22:12 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-03 22:47 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-03-03 22:58 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-04 7:25 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-03-16 3:14 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-25 13:06 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 15:38 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-01 16:16 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 21:44 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D4BE212.1090400@jbfavre.org \
--to=xen-devel@jbfavre.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).