From: Jean Baptiste Favre <xen-devel@jbfavre.org>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: PCI passthrough issue
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:15:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D4BFBE4.6080809@jbfavre.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1296818935.13091.648.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2447 bytes --]
Le 04/02/2011 12:28, Ian Campbell a écrit :
> On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 11:25 +0000, Jean Baptiste Favre wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Le 04/02/2011 12:04, Ian Campbell a écrit :
>>> On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 10:12 +0000, Jean Baptiste Favre wrote:
>>>> Hello Ian,
>>>> Applyed your patches.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>> Now, I've:
>>>> # ping -s86 10.0.0.1
>>>> PING 10.0.0.1 (10.0.0.1): 86 data bytes
>>>> __netif_receive_skb dropping skb proto 0x20
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So problem seems to occur in net/core/dev.c file, according to the patch
>>>> bellow
>>>
>>> Interesting. the number printed in the warning is type == skb->protocol
>>> == 0x20 which is not a valid protocol that I can find anywhere (nor is
>>> 0x2000 in case I'm mixing my endianesses up). Neither is 0x20 it a valid
>>> Ethernet frame length (min 64) so it's not that sort of confusion
>>> AFAICT.
>>>
>>> skb->protocol is initialised in sky2_status_intr with the return value
>>> of "eth_type_trans(skb, dev)" which as far as I can tell cannot return
>>> 0x20.
>>>
>>> The domU network configuration is using the sky2 device directly, no
>>> bridging, VLAN, tunnels or anything else like that?
>> At boot it uses bridge.
>> For the test, I delete bridge and set IP address directly on eth0
>
> OK, good.
>
> [...]
>> generic-segmentation-offload: on
> [...]
>> receive-hashing: on
>
> Can you also try turning these two off (independently and together).
No change with ethtool -K gso off
Can not change receive-hashing:
# ethtool -K eth1 rxhash off
Cannot set device flag settings: Invalid argument
>> What is a bit strange here is that I don't any more the KERN_CRIT printk
>> message.
>> Could be a false positive ?
>
> Worth bearing in mind, lets see what the next test run produces.
Seems that I got this messge only with copybreak=0.
With default value (128), no such message
More, with copybreak=0, all packets are dropped (even a ping with
default packet size is dropped. Same with ping -s1)
>> I'm currently compiling new kernel with your last patch. will keep you
>> updated
No new messages, despite your patch :(
> Thanks.
>
> Please gather the tcpdump's too.
Both tcpdump from GW and domU are Attached.
Commands were:
domU# tcpdump -n -w domU.cap -s0 -i eth0 ether host 00:1f:c6:eb:71:43 or
ether broadcast
gw# tcpdump -n -w gw.cap -s0 -i br0 ether host 00:1f:c6:eb:71:43 or
ether broadcast
[-- Attachment #2: gw.cap --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 8906 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: domU.cap --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 7484 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #4: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-04 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-12 15:38 PCI passthrough issue Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 15:43 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-12 15:53 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 16:09 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 16:36 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-12 16:56 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 17:26 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-12 17:44 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 18:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-12 20:07 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 21:40 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-12 21:46 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 22:18 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-13 11:28 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-13 19:18 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-13 20:19 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-13 20:44 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-14 14:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-14 23:29 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-17 8:59 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-17 13:58 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-22 10:22 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-27 20:27 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-27 21:47 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-28 15:47 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 11:34 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-01 12:17 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 13:20 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-01 14:12 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 14:18 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-01 15:14 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 15:38 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 16:23 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-01 19:37 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-01 22:06 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-02 9:12 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-01 23:01 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-02 9:44 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-02 15:38 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-02 15:55 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-02 15:56 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 22:04 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-02 9:27 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-02 10:24 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-02 10:59 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-02 11:33 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-02 17:42 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-04 8:43 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-04 8:53 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-04 8:54 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-04 10:12 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-04 11:04 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-04 11:25 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-04 11:28 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-04 13:15 ` Jean Baptiste Favre [this message]
2011-02-04 13:50 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-04 14:01 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-09 9:59 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-18 21:14 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-25 14:40 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-28 10:00 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-28 12:18 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-28 15:01 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-28 15:17 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
[not found] ` <4D6CB851.40103@jbfavre.org>
2011-03-03 22:12 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-03 22:47 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-03-03 22:58 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-04 7:25 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-03-16 3:14 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-25 13:06 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-02-01 15:38 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-01 16:16 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
2011-01-12 21:44 ` Jean Baptiste Favre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D4BFBE4.6080809@jbfavre.org \
--to=xen-devel@jbfavre.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).