xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-2.6.18-xen] blktap: make max # of	 tap devices a module parameter
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 18:34:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D63F3B7.90108@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D63E918020000780003327C@vpn.id2.novell.com>

On 02/22/11 16:49, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 22.02.11 at 15:20, Laszlo Ersek<lersek@redhat.com>  wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> should anybody still use the blktap(1) driver in linux-2.6.18-xen, the
>> following patch intends to make the maximum number of tapdevs
>> configurable at module insertion time. The number is clamped to [256 ..
>> NR_EVENT_CHANNELS]. I removed the definition of MAX_DEV_NAME because it
>> didn't seem to be used at all.
>>
>> Thanks for considering,
>> Laszlo Ersek
>
> Without replacing the call to register_chrdev() with one to
> __register_chrdev() (available only with 2.6.32 and newer) I
> can't see how you would get beyond 256 devices with the
> changes you propose.

Oops, sorry; I naively assumed that minor device numbers were already 
covered by an earlier change.

I figure register_chrdev() could be reimplemented in blktap, based on 
lower-level char_dev.c (and kobject) primitives, but I'm not sure if the 
original goal is worth that ugliness. In any case, should I bother 
posting a version like that eventually, or would it have no chance of 
being accepted?

Thanks & sorry for the noise.
lacos

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-22 17:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-22 14:20 [PATCH linux-2.6.18-xen] blktap: make max # of tap devices a module parameter Laszlo Ersek
2011-02-22 15:49 ` Jan Beulich
2011-02-22 17:34   ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2011-02-22 17:44     ` Daniel Stodden
2011-02-22 18:08       ` Laszlo Ersek
2011-02-22 18:59         ` Daniel Stodden
2011-02-23 10:38       ` Jan Beulich
2011-02-24 16:40         ` Jan Beulich
2011-02-24 19:59           ` Daniel Stodden
2011-02-24 20:10           ` Daniel Stodden
2011-02-23  9:42     ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D63F3B7.90108@redhat.com \
    --to=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).