xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>
To: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
Cc: "Przywara, Andre" <Andre.Przywara@amd.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] remove unneeded test for cpu in cpupool
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:36:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D8092BB.4030006@ts.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C9A63DD6.14E2D%keir.xen@gmail.com>

On 03/16/11 11:13, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 16/03/2011 06:34, "Juergen Gross"<juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>  wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> attached patch removes an unneeded check in vcpu_migrate().
>>
>> Andre, could you please give it a try on your 48 core machine with
>>
>> xl cpupool-numa-split
>>
>> I'd like to make sure the check is really not needed. On my machines it worked
>> okay, but your machine seems to trigger races more easily.
>
> Could you BUG_ON failing this test when we exit the retry loop? It seems a
> suitable loop post-condition.

Not easily. The cpu_valid mask of a cpupool might change between the call of
pick_cpu and the test. In the normal case this is okay, as removing a cpu
from a cpupool (which is the critical case) will call cpu_disable_scheduler()
after removing the cpu from the mask, which will migrate the vcpu away.

Using a saved copy of cpu_valid for the test isn't working either, if a cpu
is added to and removed from the cpupool in a very short time. I would have
to use a generation count for the cpu_valid mask and do the check only if
the count didn't change. I think this is little bit of overkill here, but if
you'd prefer it, I can do a patch.


Juergen

-- 
Juergen Gross                 Principal Developer Operating Systems
TSP ES&S SWE OS6                       Telephone: +49 (0) 89 3222 2967
Fujitsu Technology Solutions              e-mail: juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com
Domagkstr. 28                           Internet: ts.fujitsu.com
D-80807 Muenchen                 Company details: ts.fujitsu.com/imprint.html

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-16 10:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-16  6:34 [Patch] remove unneeded test for cpu in cpupool Juergen Gross
2011-03-16 10:13 ` Keir Fraser
2011-03-16 10:36   ` Juergen Gross [this message]
2011-03-16 11:14     ` Keir Fraser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D8092BB.4030006@ts.fujitsu.com \
    --to=juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=Andre.Przywara@amd.com \
    --cc=keir.xen@gmail.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).