From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Subject: Re: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V11 00/15] Xen device model
	support
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:13:09 +0100
Message-ID: <4D88BC85.9040602@suse.de>
References: <1299004529-31290-1-git-send-email-anthony.perard@citrix.com>
	<4D88B0C6.6040506@suse.de>
	<AANLkTim49k4j5epjeRHnGooB3mQPrMte9D-kXNftC4i1@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim49k4j5epjeRHnGooB3mQPrMte9D-kXNftC4i1@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
Cc: Xen Devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, QEMU-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 03/22/2011 03:47 PM, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 14:23, Alexander Graf<agraf@suse.de>  wrote:
>> On 03/01/2011 07:35 PM, anthony.perard@citrix.com wrote:
>>> From: Anthony PERARD<anthony.perard@citrix.com>
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Here is the few change since the V10:
>>>
>>>    - Add braces for blocks with single statement in the clean-up patch;
>>>    - the patch that builds Xen only for x86 have been removed, instead,
>>>      xen_domainbuild is built with libhw and other Xen files are built for
>>> i386
>>>      target only;
>>>    - the redirection structure with function pointer have been removed,
>>> instead,
>>>      there are few #define or static inline function use for the
>>> compatibility;
>> ARGH!
>>
>> The point of the redirection structure was so I can plug in with xenner and
>> replace all the xen calls with in-qemu versions. If you remove it, I'll have
>> to put it back in in the xenner patch set :(.
>>
>> We need some sort of abstraction between calling xs_ functions and actually
>> calling them. Wrapping all xs_ calls in static inlines would be fine for
>> that, as would the indirect calling table.
> As my series doesn't change a lot of things in the xen code, I think
> it is better than you put it back in your patch set.

Ok, I'll try to see if I can get things based on top of your patch set, 
then do actual code review.


Alex