From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: [PATCH] libxl: do not expose libxenctrl/libxenstore headers via libxl.h Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 09:30:59 +0100 Message-ID: <4D9D9263020000780003A58E@vpn.id2.novell.com> References: <3aecf852f357e9217144.1302103165@localhost.localdomain> <19868.35898.53337.358242@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <19868.35898.53337.358242@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Jackson Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> On 06.04.11 at 17:52, Ian Jackson wrote: > Ian Campbell writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: do not expose=20 > libxenctrl/libxenstore headers via libxl.h"): >> libxl: do not expose libxenctrl/libxenstore headers via libxl.h >>=20 >> This completely removes libxenstore from libxl users' view. >>=20 >> xl still needs libxenctrl directly due to the direct use of the >> xentoollog functionality but it is not exposed to the indirect linkage >> anymore. >=20 > Applied. >=20 > Shame about the lack of API compatibility, but really the old was too > awful. Shouldn't API incompatible changes lead to immediate bumping of the major version of the affected shared library? Jan