From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com>
To: Wei Wang2 <wei.wang2@amd.com>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@amd.com>,
Wei Huang2 <Wei.Huang2@amd.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] AMD IOMMU: Fix an interrupt remapping issue
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 14:43:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D9F2D3D020000780003A9AD@vpn.id2.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201104081335.36718.wei.wang2@amd.com>
>>> On 08.04.11 at 13:35, Wei Wang2 <wei.wang2@amd.com> wrote:
> Some device could generate bogus interrupts if an IO-APIC RTE and an iommu
> interrupt remapping entry are not consistent during 2 adjacent 64bits IO-APIC
> RTE updates. For example, if the 2nd operation updates destination bits in
> RTE for SATA device and unmask it, in some case, SATA device will assert
> ioapic pin to generate interrupt immediately using new destination but iommu
> could still translate it into the old destination, then dom0 would be
> confused. To fix that, we sync up interrupt remapping entry with IO-APIC IRE
> on every 32 bits operation and foward IOAPIC RTE updates after interrupt
> remapping table has been changed.
I don't think this is correct: Without the patch, the filling of ioapic_rte
takes into account the value already written. Now that you only write
the value at the end of the function, you should overwrite the
affected half with "value" immediately before calling
update_intremap_entry_from_ioapic(). (Without knowing which half
gets written, passing "value" to update_intremap_entry_from_ioapic()
is pointless, and indeed the function doesn't use that parameter.)
Eliminating the double write if reg == rte_lo would also seem desirable
(and in no case should you write back the old value after having called
update_intremap_entry_from_ioapic()).
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-08 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-08 11:35 [PATCH] AMD IOMMU: Fix an interrupt remapping issue Wei Wang2
2011-04-08 13:43 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2011-04-08 14:26 ` Wei Wang2
2011-04-08 14:39 ` Jan Beulich
2011-04-08 15:06 ` Wei Wang2
2011-04-08 16:52 ` [PATCH] AMD IOMMU: Fix an interrupt remapping issue (v2) Wei Wang2
2011-04-11 7:23 ` Jan Beulich
2011-04-11 7:39 ` Wei Wang2
2011-04-11 10:31 ` [PATCH V3] AMD IOMMU: Fix an interrupt remapping issue Wei Wang2
2011-04-11 11:35 ` Jan Beulich
2011-07-19 9:37 ` George Dunlap
2011-07-19 9:59 ` George Dunlap
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-04-08 10:52 [PATCH] " Wei Wang2
2011-04-08 11:26 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D9F2D3D020000780003A9AD@vpn.id2.novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=Wei.Huang2@amd.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@amd.com \
--cc=wei.wang2@amd.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).