From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: RFC Patch for the "x86-64, mm: Put early page table high"
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:46:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DBB4DDD.3000703@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110429213337.GC5593@dumpdata.com>
On 04/29/2011 02:33 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 01:58:33PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> On 04/29/2011 08:46 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>> Without a fix for this 2.6.39-rc5 fails during bootup.
>>>
>>> It fails such early, you only Xen telling you that the domain crashed.
>>>
>>> There is one patch to fix this, and the last word was here:
>>> http://marc.info/?i=4DAF0ECB.8060009@goop.org
>>>
>>> But after nothing had been heard from Peter.
>>>
>>> So I decided to look at this from a different perspective: why not
>>> contain the workaround inside Xen early bootup code.
>>>
>>> I've tested this code as DomU (1G, 2G, 3G), Dom0 (8G, 4G, 1000M)
>>> and they all booted fine. Hadn't compile tested it on 32-bit and
>>> I think it will actually complain about it. Let me fix that.
>>>
>>> See attached patch (also present in stable/bug-fixes-for-rc5) which also
>>> has the "xen: mask_rw_pte mark RO all pagetable pages up to pgt_buf_top"
>>> integrated in.
>> Well, if we can hide the fix away in our code, then that has obvious
>> advantages. But I worry that this change is pretty closely dependent on
>> how the other code works, and would be fragile in the face of further
>> changes to that code (esp since there's no obvious coupling between the
>> two, so anyone changing the arch/x86 code wouldn't have any clues to
>> look at the corresponding Xen code).
> True. I am hoping to remove this in 2.6.40 though...
That makes it more palatable. What's the solution for 40+?
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-29 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-29 15:46 RFC Patch for the "x86-64, mm: Put early page table high" Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-04-29 20:58 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-04-29 21:33 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-04-29 22:38 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-04-29 23:46 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2011-05-02 14:03 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DBB4DDD.3000703@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).