From: John Weekes <lists.xen@nuclearfallout.net>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
winston.l.wang@intel.com, mark.langsdorf@amd.com,
ke.yu@intel.com, gang.wei@intel.com
Subject: Re: Performance difference between Xen versions
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 12:54:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DBF0BF4.9080009@nuclearfallout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110502193623.GB14666@dumpdata.com>
On 5/2/2011 12:36 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> <looks aroud> You are asking me I presume?
>
> Ummm, no idea. I would actually email the authors of the those patches (CC-ed here).
Not asking you specifically, no. I just did a reply-all. I would imagine
that the maintainers of the cpufreq code who I originally CC'd when
sending to the list would know best, but I might just be missing
something obvious again..
-John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-02 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-29 12:32 Performance difference between Xen versions Juergen Gross
2011-04-29 13:28 ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-29 13:35 ` Juergen Gross
2011-04-29 14:58 ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-29 16:10 ` Jan Beulich
2011-05-02 5:31 ` Juergen Gross
2011-05-02 6:41 ` Keir Fraser
2011-05-02 7:23 ` Jan Beulich
2011-05-02 8:00 ` Juergen Gross
2011-05-02 8:15 ` Jan Beulich
2011-05-02 8:23 ` Juergen Gross
2011-05-02 8:49 ` Keir Fraser
2011-05-03 3:06 ` Tian, Kevin
2011-05-06 13:49 ` Juergen Gross
2011-05-06 14:27 ` Jan Beulich
2011-05-11 6:08 ` Tian, Kevin
2011-05-11 6:23 ` Juergen Gross
2011-05-02 17:52 ` John Weekes
2011-05-02 18:12 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-05-02 18:43 ` John Weekes
2011-05-02 19:16 ` John Weekes
2011-05-02 19:36 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-05-02 19:54 ` John Weekes [this message]
2011-05-03 2:16 ` Tian, Kevin
2011-05-03 3:04 ` Tian, Kevin
2011-05-03 3:39 ` John Weekes
2011-05-03 7:23 ` Tian, Kevin
[not found] ` <4DBF13BB.3000309@nuclearfallout.net>
2011-05-03 7:23 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DBF0BF4.9080009@nuclearfallout.net \
--to=lists.xen@nuclearfallout.net \
--cc=gang.wei@intel.com \
--cc=ke.yu@intel.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=mark.langsdorf@amd.com \
--cc=winston.l.wang@intel.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).