From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: [PATCH V15 00/18] Xen device model support Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 09:28:47 -0500 Message-ID: <4DC7FA1F.1090807@codemonkey.ws> References: <1304593113-10689-1-git-send-email-anthony.perard@citrix.com> <4DC7F2F1.5030006@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4DC7F2F1.5030006@suse.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org To: Alexander Graf Cc: anthony.perard@citrix.com, Xen Devel , QEMU-devel , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 05/09/2011 08:58 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 05/05/2011 12:58 PM, anthony.perard@citrix.com wrote: >> From: Anthony PERARD >> >> Hi all, >> >> Here is an update on the series that add the support of a Xen HVM >> guest to >> QEMU. > > It doesn't introduce regressions and I really don't want to keep this > patch set hanging more than it should be. If we encounter anything that > needs changes later, we can change them later and as long as the patches > don't affect anything but Xen, I'm perfectly fine with the Xen folks > breaking their own support :). > > So from my side this set is: > > Acked-by: Alexander Graf > > Anthony, feel like pulling? Feel like doing a pull request? I'd prefer if you did that and added your Signed-off-by. Regards, Anthony Liguori > > > Alex >