From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Linux 2.6.39 - what Xen components went
	in.
Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 17:32:53 +0800
Message-ID: <4DCE4C45.8080706@debian.org>
References: <20110513143615.GA16193@dumpdata.com>	<BANLkTim_hgQ2qPWr9aZ8OtTrurz4LqA=jw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110513164927.GA18484@dumpdata.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110513164927.GA18484@dumpdata.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>,
	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>,
	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, xen-users@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 05/14/2011 12:49 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>
>> I assume this means that drivers/block/xen-blkback.c is the last major
>> milestone to be pushed upstream?
>>     
> There are also some semi-major ones, but right now the xen-blkback is important
> since it provides so much more performance benefit than the QEMU one.
>   

Thanks a lot Konrad, for the report.

Can you tell what the problem was with of xen-blkback.c?

Thomas