From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: Linux 2.6.39 - what Xen components
	went in.
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 09:27:05 -0700
Message-ID: <4DD15059.2030609@goop.org>
References: <20110513143615.GA16193@dumpdata.com>
	<BANLkTim_hgQ2qPWr9aZ8OtTrurz4LqA=jw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110513164927.GA18484@dumpdata.com>
	<13910110377.20110514093443@eikelenboom.it>
	<20110515155127.GL32595@reaktio.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110515155127.GL32595@reaktio.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Pasi_K=E4rkk=E4inen?= <pasik@iki.fi>
Cc: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, xen-users@lists.xensource.com, Joseph Glanville <joseph.glanville@orionvm.com.au>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 05/15/2011 08:51 AM, Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 09:34:43AM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> Friday, May 13, 2011, 6:49:27 PM, you wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:46:18AM +1000, Joseph Glanville wrote:
>>>> Great work everyone. :)
>>> Combined with this week acceptance of Xen in upstream QEMU, and I thi=
nk
>>> that the majority of folks on xen-devel are going to have a hard hang=
over
>>> on Monday :-)
>> Cheers and thx all ! :-)
>>
>>>> I assume this means that drivers/block/xen-blkback.c is the last maj=
or
>>>> milestone to be pushed upstream?
>>> There are also some semi-major ones, but right now the xen-blkback is=
 important
>>> since it provides so much more performance benefit than the QEMU one.
>> A semi one for me personally would be acpi-processor stuff to make xen=
pm work.
>> But having blkback would make it at least ok to test for some longer p=
eriod :-)
>>
> At Xen Hack-a-tron two months ago Jeremy was mentioning pvops acpi patc=
hes..
>
> Jeremy: Any plans for submitting those upstream?=20

Konrad has a set of acpi patches from the Virtual Computer folks I think.

    J