xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: xen devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: APIC MSRs query
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 14:43:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DD297B90200007800041A32@vpn.id2.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DD27760.9020706@citrix.com>

>>> On 17.05.11 at 15:25, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I am currently cleaning up the APIC code for the sake of 
> shutdown/reboot/crashdump and have a query about the (modified for 
> brevity) snippet of code:
> 
> uint64_t msr_content;
> rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_APICBASE, msr_content);
> msr_content |= MSR_IA32_APICBASE_ENABLE | MSR_IA32_APICBASE_EXTD;
> msr_content = (uint32_t)msr_content;
> wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_APICBASE, msr_content);
> 
> which is added into apic.c in changeset b622e411eef8, and has propagated 
> elsewhere in the codebase during subsequent cleanups etc.
> 
> The MP spec and x2apic spec states that bits [35:12] of 
> MSR_IA32_APICBASE is the base APIC MMIO address.  Is there reason why 
> the code (almost always) clears the top 4 bits, or is it just an 
> overlooked mistake?

I think this is a benign mistake. Benign because I don't think there is
a meaningful (to Xen at least) number of systems that would not
have their LAPIC at the default address (which fits in 32 bits).

Jan

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-17 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-17 13:25 APIC MSRs query Andrew Cooper
2011-05-17 13:43 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2011-05-17 13:49   ` Andrew Cooper
2011-05-17 13:59   ` Ian Campbell
2011-05-17 14:08     ` Andrew Cooper
2011-05-17 14:08     ` Jan Beulich
2011-05-17 14:53       ` Keir Fraser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DD297B90200007800041A32@vpn.id2.novell.com \
    --to=jbeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).