xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Huang <wei.huang2@amd.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: clear CPUID output of leaf 0xd for Dom0 when xsave is disabled
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 16:01:57 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DD433C5.4060208@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DD3B3370200007800041DB6@vpn.id2.novell.com>

I tested cpuid on a real hardware. If software wants, reading all 
sub-leaves are allowed even on hardware which doesn't support XSAVE. The 
instruction just returns 0. So I don't think we need to zap output for 
sub-leaves > 1.


    0x0000000c 0x00: eax=0x00000000 ebx=0x00000000 ecx=0x00000000 
edx=0x00000000
    0x0000000d 0x00: eax=0x00000003 ebx=0x00000240 ecx=0x00000240 
edx=0x00000000
    0x0000000d 0x02: eax=0x00000000 ebx=0x00000000 ecx=0x00000000 
edx=0x00000000
    0x0000000d 0x3e: eax=0x00000000 ebx=0x00000000 ecx=0x00000000 
edx=0x00000000

On 05/18/2011 04:53 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Linux starting with 2.6.36 uses the XSAVEOPT instruction and has
> certain code paths that look only at the feature bit reported through
> CPUID leaf 0xd sub-leaf 1 (i.e. without qualifying the check with one
> evaluating leaf 4 output). Consequently the hypervisor ought to mimic
> actual hardware in clearing leaf 0xd output when not supporting xsave.
>
> (Note that this is only a minimal fix. It may be necessary, e.g. for
> LWP, to also adjust sub-leaf 0's bit masks and perhaps zap output of
> sub-leaves>  1 when the respective bit in sub-leaf 0 is getting
> cleared.)
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich<jbeulich@novell.com>
>
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
> @@ -836,6 +836,10 @@ static void pv_cpuid(struct cpu_user_reg
>           __clear_bit(X86_FEATURE_NODEID_MSR % 32,&c);
>           __clear_bit(X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT % 32,&c);
>           break;
> +    case 0xd: /* XSAVE */
> +        if ( xsave_enabled(current) )
> +            break;
> +        /* fall through */
>       case 5: /* MONITOR/MWAIT */
>       case 0xa: /* Architectural Performance Monitor Features */
>       case 0x8000000a: /* SVM revision and features */
>
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-18 21:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-18  9:53 [PATCH] x86: clear CPUID output of leaf 0xd for Dom0 when xsave is disabled Jan Beulich
2011-05-18 21:01 ` Wei Huang [this message]
2011-05-19  6:47   ` Jan Beulich
     [not found]     ` <4DD538A2.7050801@amd.com>
     [not found]       ` <4DD55BF402000078000422E8@vpn.id2.novell.com>
     [not found]         ` <EE335F95F28A664DB4A21289D2AA053B0109C14662@SAUSEXMBP01.amd.com>
2011-05-20  7:08           ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DD433C5.4060208@amd.com \
    --to=wei.huang2@amd.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).