From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vincent Hanquez Subject: Re: [PATCH] add a way to disable xen's udev script. Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:07:12 +0100 Message-ID: <4DF09B50.1020401@eu.citrix.com> References: <4DEFA993.1020803@eu.citrix.com> <1307554945.4176.47.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> <4DEFCC40.3000103@eu.citrix.com> <1307562567.4176.57.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> <4DEFDCB5.4020301@eu.citrix.com> <1307605345.775.758.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <4DF08BF4.3010904@eu.citrix.com> <1307611406.775.781.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1307611406.775.781.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Campbell Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 06/09/2011 10:23 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > Feel free to suggest patches which implement any better scheme you have. > I did already. My solution involves going to step 2 directly, keeping a simple way for compat toolstacks to still work dynamically in parallel with new more modern toolstack that doesn't use those udev script. And eventually reach step 3 that will remove the udev scripts altogether (which render fancy tweaks in those udev scripts (step 1) absolutely moot) Unfortunately you really want to go to step 1, before step 2 which involves doing lots of unnecessary work. I don't have any interest in that as stated above. -- Vincent