From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: "Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: HYBRID: PV in HVM container
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 12:27:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E4C160D.2000206@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1312880045.26263.28.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
On 08/09/2011 01:54 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Also there are arguments to be made for HYBRID over PVHVM in terms of
> ease of manageability (i.e. a lot of folks like the dom0-supplied kernel
> idiom which PV enables), avoiding the need for a virtualised BIOS and
> emulated boot paths, HYBRID can potentially give a best of both in the
> trade off between standard-PV vs. HVM/PVHVM while also not needing a
> QEMU process for each guest (which helps scalability and so on) etc. I
> think HYBRID is worthwhile even if it is basically on-par with PVHVM for
> some workloads.
And it's amazing how much stuff goes away when you can set CONFIG_PCI=n...
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-17 19:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-27 19:24 HYBRID: PV in HVM container Mukesh Rathor
2011-06-27 19:36 ` Keir Fraser
2011-06-28 1:51 ` Mukesh Rathor
2011-06-28 7:46 ` Keir Fraser
2011-06-28 8:30 ` Ian Campbell
2011-06-28 8:35 ` Keir Fraser
2011-06-28 8:49 ` Ian Campbell
2011-06-28 10:46 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-06-28 10:50 ` Ian Campbell
2011-06-28 18:32 ` Mukesh Rathor
2011-06-28 18:39 ` Keir Fraser
2011-06-28 8:31 ` Ian Campbell
2011-06-28 17:56 ` Mukesh Rathor
2011-07-01 1:54 ` Mukesh Rathor
2011-07-09 1:53 ` Mukesh Rathor
2011-07-09 7:35 ` Keir Fraser
2011-07-28 1:58 ` Mukesh Rathor
2011-07-28 11:34 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-07-29 15:48 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-29 16:41 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-07-29 17:28 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-29 18:00 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-07-29 18:00 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-29 18:16 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-08-09 8:54 ` Ian Campbell
2011-08-17 19:27 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2011-07-29 15:43 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-11-17 23:38 ` Mukesh Rathor
2011-11-18 12:21 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-11-19 0:17 ` Mukesh Rathor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E4C160D.2000206@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=keir.xen@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).