xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [xen-unstable test] 8803: regressions - FAIL
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 20:55:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E5FD505.8020504@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1314894926.28989.146.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>

On 09/01/11 18:35, Ian Campbell wrote:

> diff -r bb97bd46df6c -r 4309ff953500 xen/include/asm-x86/config.h
> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/config.h	Thu Sep 01 16:03:21 2011 +0100
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/config.h	Thu Sep 01 17:34:41 2011 +0100
> @@ -49,6 +49,8 @@
>
>   #ifdef MAX_PHYS_CPUS
>   #define NR_CPUS MAX_PHYS_CPUS
> +#elif defined __i386__
> +#define NR_CPUS 128
>   #else
>   #define NR_CPUS 256
>   #endif

Ah, sorry. This special-casing / after-the-fact #error for 32-bit is 
actually there in the RHEL-5 fork, and there I bumped only the x86_64 
default (the 32-bit one is set to 32). When I looked at the upstream 
source, I noticed only a single case (set to 128), and I figured 
upstream either makes the 32/64 distinction by different means, or they 
support 128 PCPUs on 32-bit too, and 128 being >> than 32, I thought 256 
should be fine as well.

I was wrong, sorry for wasting your time.

lacos

      parent reply	other threads:[~2011-09-01 18:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-01 15:59 [xen-unstable test] 8803: regressions - FAIL xen.org
2011-09-01 16:23 ` Ian Jackson
2011-09-01 16:35   ` Ian Campbell
2011-09-01 16:54     ` Ian Jackson
2011-09-01 18:55     ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E5FD505.8020504@redhat.com \
    --to=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).