xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Marczykowski <marmarek@mimuw.edu.pl>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: blkfront problem in pvops kernel when barriers enabled
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:16:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E665572.7080009@mimuw.edu.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110906163213.GC5264@dumpdata.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2289 bytes --]

On 06.09.2011 18:32, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 12:49:42PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Pvops block frontend (tested vanilla 3.0.3, 3.1rc2, Konrad's testing
>> branch) produces a lot of I/O errors when barriers are enabled but
>> cannot be used.
>>
>> On xenlinux I've got message:
>> [   15.036921] blkfront: xvdb: empty write barrier op failed
>> [   15.036936] blkfront: xvdb: barriers disabled
>>
>> and after that, everything works fine. On pvops - I/O errors.
>> As backend I've used 2.6.38.3 xenlinux (based on SUSE package) and
>> 3.1rc2 with same result.
> 
> Hm, and the 'feature-barrier' was enabled on in those backends?
> That is really bizzare considering that those backends don't actually
> support WRITE_BARRIER anymore.

At least in 2.6.38.3 xenlinux  (SUSE). Now I'm not sure if 3.1rc2 also
needed this modification (can't find it now).

>> When I disable barriers (patching blkbackend to set feature-barrier=0)
>> everything works fine with all above versions.
> 
> Ok, and the patch you sent "[PATCH] Initialize vars in blkfront_connect"
> as well?

Yes.
I've noticed now that this patch was needed only on your testing branch
(not vanilla kernel).

>> My setup is xen-4.1.1 (if it matters), backends: phy from device-mapper
>> device and phy from loop device; frontends covered by device-mapper
>> snapshot, which is set up in domU initramfs.
>>
>> It looks like some race condition, because when I setup device-mapper in
>> domU and mount it manually (which cause some delays between steps), it
>> works fine...
>>
>> Have you idea why it happens? What additional data can I provide debug it?
>>
>> In addition it should be possible to disable barrier without patching
>> module... Perhaps some pciback module parameter? Or leave feature-*
> 
> Not sure why you would touch pciback.. 

I mean blkback of course.

> But the barrier should _not_
> be enabled in those backends. The 'feature-flush-cache' should be.

(on 3.1rc2) Looking to xenstore now there is 'feature-flush-cache=1' and
no 'feature-barrier'. So it is ok.

-- 
Pozdrawiam / Best Regards,
Marek Marczykowski         | RLU #390519
marmarek at mimuw edu pl   | xmpp:marmarek at staszic waw pl


[-- Attachment #1.2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 5842 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-09-06 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-04 10:49 blkfront problem in pvops kernel when barriers enabled Marek Marczykowski
2011-09-06 16:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-06 16:55   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-06 17:47     ` Marek Marczykowski
2011-09-06 17:16   ` Marek Marczykowski [this message]
2011-09-07  1:47     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-07  9:50       ` Jan Beulich
2011-09-07 10:19         ` Jan Beulich
2011-09-07 17:41           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-08  8:06             ` Jan Beulich
2011-09-08 13:11               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-07 17:34       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-09-07 17:43         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-07 18:58           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-09-07 19:31             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-12-01 19:08     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E665572.7080009@mimuw.edu.pl \
    --to=marmarek@mimuw.edu.pl \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).