xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: Re: 4.0/4.1 requests - IO-APIC EOI v4 [RFC]
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 17:50:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E6A43EA.8060700@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E6A430B.30308@citrix.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 555 bytes --]

On 09/09/11 17:47, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 09/09/11 17:22, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> ---SNIP---
>>
>> Version 3.  Applied Jan's suggestions, and extended some of the comments.
>>
> V4 - get the BUG_ON logic correct (oops).
>
> I have now done a few reboot tests and a kexec test with this patch.
>
> Are there any other tests you would suggest, or shall I formally submit
> the patch for unstable and backporting?
>
Remember to qrefresh this time.

-- 
Andrew Cooper - Dom0 Kernel Engineer, Citrix XenServer
T: +44 (0)1223 225 900, http://www.citrix.com


[-- Attachment #2: IO-APIC-eoi.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 7216 bytes --]

diff -r 0268e7380953 xen/arch/x86/io_apic.c
--- a/xen/arch/x86/io_apic.c	Mon Sep 05 15:10:28 2011 +0100
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/io_apic.c	Fri Sep 09 17:48:33 2011 +0100
@@ -68,6 +68,16 @@ int __read_mostly nr_ioapics;
 #define MAX_PLUS_SHARED_IRQS nr_irqs_gsi
 #define PIN_MAP_SIZE (MAX_PLUS_SHARED_IRQS + nr_irqs_gsi)
 
+
+#define ioapic_has_eoi_reg(apic) (mp_ioapics[(apic)].mpc_apicver >= 0x20)
+
+static void __io_apic_eoi(unsigned int apic, unsigned int vector, unsigned int pin);
+static void io_apic_eoi(unsigned int apic, unsigned int vector, unsigned int pin);
+
+#define io_apic_eoi_vector(apic, vector) io_apic_eoi((apic), (vector), -1)
+#define io_apic_eoi_pin(apic, pin) io_apic_eoi((apic), -1, (pin))
+
+
 /*
  * This is performance-critical, we want to do it O(1)
  *
@@ -357,7 +367,7 @@ static void __eoi_IO_APIC_irq(unsigned i
         pin = entry->pin;
         if (pin == -1)
             break;
-        io_apic_eoi(entry->apic, vector);
+        __io_apic_eoi(entry->apic, vector, pin);
         if (!entry->next)
             break;
         entry = irq_2_pin + entry->next;
@@ -397,18 +407,7 @@ static void clear_IO_APIC_pin(unsigned i
             entry.trigger = 1;
             __ioapic_write_entry(apic, pin, TRUE, entry);
         }
-        if (mp_ioapics[apic].mpc_apicver >= 0x20)
-            io_apic_eoi(apic, entry.vector);
-        else {
-            /*
-             * Mechanism by which we clear remoteIRR in this case is by
-             * changing the trigger mode to edge and back to level.
-             */
-            entry.trigger = 0;
-            __ioapic_write_entry(apic, pin, TRUE, entry);
-            entry.trigger = 1;
-            __ioapic_write_entry(apic, pin, TRUE, entry);
-        }
+        __io_apic_eoi(apic, entry.vector, pin);
     }
 
     /*
@@ -1750,7 +1749,7 @@ static void end_level_ioapic_irq (unsign
     {
         int ioapic;
         for (ioapic = 0; ioapic < nr_ioapics; ioapic++)
-            io_apic_eoi(ioapic, i);
+            io_apic_eoi_vector(ioapic, i);
     }
 
     v = apic_read(APIC_TMR + ((i & ~0x1f) >> 1));
@@ -2622,3 +2621,124 @@ void __init init_ioapic_mappings(void)
     printk(XENLOG_INFO "IRQ limits: %u GSI, %u MSI/MSI-X\n",
            nr_irqs_gsi, nr_irqs - nr_irqs_gsi);
 }
+
+/* EOI an IO-APIC entry.  One of vector or pin may be -1, indicating that
+ * it should be worked out using the other.  This function disables interrupts
+ * and takes the ioapic_lock */
+static void io_apic_eoi(unsigned int apic, unsigned int vector, unsigned int pin)
+{
+    unsigned int flags;
+    spin_lock_irqsave(&ioapic_lock, flags);
+    __io_apic_eoi(apic, vector, pin);
+    spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ioapic_lock, flags);
+}
+
+/* EOI an IO-APIC entry.  One of vector or pin may be -1, indicating that
+ * it should be worked out using the other.  This function expect that the
+ * ioapic_lock is taken, and interrupts are disabled (or there is a good reason
+ * not to), and that if both pin and vector are passed, that they refer to the
+ * same redirection entry in the IO-APIC. */
+static void __io_apic_eoi(unsigned int apic, unsigned int vector, unsigned int pin)
+{
+    /* Ensure some useful information is passed in */
+    BUG_ON( (vector == -1 && pin == -1) );
+    
+    /* Prefer the use of the EOI register if available */
+    if ( ioapic_has_eoi_reg(apic) )
+    {
+        /* If vector is unknown, read it from the IO-APIC */
+        if ( vector == -1 )
+            vector = __ioapic_read_entry(apic, pin, TRUE).vector;
+
+        *(IO_APIC_BASE(apic)+16) = vector;
+    }
+    else
+    {
+        /* Else fake an EOI by switching to edge triggered mode
+         * and back */
+        struct IO_APIC_route_entry entry;
+        bool_t need_to_unmask = 0;
+
+        /* If pin is unknown, search for it */
+        if ( pin == -1 )
+        {
+            unsigned int p;
+            for ( p = 0; p < nr_ioapic_registers[apic]; ++p )
+            {
+                entry = __ioapic_read_entry(apic, p, TRUE);
+                if ( entry.vector == vector )
+                {
+                    pin = p;
+                    /* break; */
+
+                    /* Here should be a break out of the loop, but at the 
+                     * Xen code doesn't actually prevent multiple IO-APIC
+                     * entries being assigned the same vector, so EOI all
+                     * pins which have the correct vector.
+                     *
+                     * Remove the following code when the above assertion
+                     * is fulfilled. */
+
+                    if ( ! entry.mask )
+                    {
+                        /* If entry is not currently masked, mask it and make
+                         * a note to unmask it later */
+                        entry.mask = 1;
+                        __ioapic_write_entry(apic, pin, TRUE, entry);
+                        need_to_unmask = 1;
+                    }
+
+                    /* Flip the trigger mode to edge and back */
+                    entry.trigger = 0;
+                    __ioapic_write_entry(apic, pin, TRUE, entry);
+                    entry.trigger = 1;
+                    __ioapic_write_entry(apic, pin, TRUE, entry);
+
+                    if ( need_to_unmask )
+                    {
+                        /* Unmask if neccesary */
+                        entry.mask = 0;
+                        __ioapic_write_entry(apic, pin, TRUE, entry);
+                    }
+
+                }
+            }
+            
+            /* If search fails, nothing to do */
+
+            /* if ( pin == -1 ) */
+
+            /* Because the loop wasn't broken out of (see comment above),
+             * all relevant pins have been EOI, so we can always return.
+             * 
+             * Re-instate the if statement above when the Xen logic has been
+             * fixed.*/
+
+            return;
+        }
+
+        entry = __ioapic_read_entry(apic, pin, TRUE);
+
+        if ( ! entry.mask )
+        {
+            /* If entry is not currently masked, mask it and make
+             * a note to unmask it later */
+            entry.mask = 1;
+            __ioapic_write_entry(apic, pin, TRUE, entry);
+            need_to_unmask = 1;
+        }
+
+        /* Flip the trigger mode to edge and back */
+        entry.trigger = 0;
+        __ioapic_write_entry(apic, pin, TRUE, entry);
+        entry.trigger = 1;
+        __ioapic_write_entry(apic, pin, TRUE, entry);
+
+        if ( need_to_unmask )
+        {
+            /* Unmask if neccesary */
+            entry.mask = 0;
+            __ioapic_write_entry(apic, pin, TRUE, entry);
+        }
+    }
+}
diff -r 0268e7380953 xen/include/asm-x86/io_apic.h
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/io_apic.h	Mon Sep 05 15:10:28 2011 +0100
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/io_apic.h	Fri Sep 09 17:48:33 2011 +0100
@@ -157,11 +157,6 @@ static inline void io_apic_write(unsigne
 	__io_apic_write(apic, reg, value);
 }
 
-static inline void io_apic_eoi(unsigned int apic, unsigned int vector)
-{
-	*(IO_APIC_BASE(apic)+16) = vector;
-}
-
 /*
  * Re-write a value: to be used for read-modify-write
  * cycles where the read already set up the index register.

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-09 16:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-08  9:19 4.0/4.1 requests Jan Beulich
2011-09-08 10:12 ` Jan Beulich
2011-09-08 11:29   ` Keir Fraser
2011-09-08 10:17 ` Keir Fraser
2011-09-08 10:48   ` Andrew Cooper
2011-09-08 11:11     ` Keir Fraser
2011-09-08 11:44     ` Jan Beulich
2011-09-08 13:18       ` 4.0/4.1 requests - IO-APIC EOI [RFC] Andrew Cooper
2011-09-08 13:40         ` Jan Beulich
2011-09-08 13:56           ` Andrew Cooper
2011-09-09 15:06             ` Re: 4.0/4.1 requests - IO-APIC EOI v2 [RFC] Andrew Cooper
2011-09-09 15:39               ` Jan Beulich
2011-09-09 15:55                 ` Andrew Cooper
2011-09-09 16:03                   ` Jan Beulich
2011-09-09 16:22                     ` Re: 4.0/4.1 requests - IO-APIC EOI v3 [RFC] Andrew Cooper
2011-09-09 16:47                       ` Re: 4.0/4.1 requests - IO-APIC EOI v4 [RFC] Andrew Cooper
2011-09-09 16:50                         ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2011-09-12  6:50                         ` Jan Beulich
2011-09-12 10:15                           ` Andrew Cooper
2011-09-12 10:23                             ` Jan Beulich
2011-09-12 11:30                               ` Keir Fraser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E6A43EA.8060700@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).