From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/5] vl.c: Do not save RAM state when
 Xen is used.
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:12:50 -0600
Message-ID: <4EEA0E72.20105@codemonkey.ws>
References: <1323467645-24271-1-git-send-email-anthony.perard@citrix.com>
	<1323467645-24271-2-git-send-email-anthony.perard@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <1323467645-24271-2-git-send-email-anthony.perard@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org
Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org
To: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
Cc: Xen Devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, QEMU-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 12/09/2011 03:54 PM, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> In Xen case, the guest RAM is not handle by QEMU, and it is saved by Xen tools.
> So, we just avoid to register the RAM save state handler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD<anthony.perard@citrix.com>
> ---
>   vl.c |    6 ++++--
>   1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/vl.c b/vl.c
> index f5afed4..e7dced2 100644
> --- a/vl.c
> +++ b/vl.c
> @@ -3273,8 +3273,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
>       default_drive(default_sdcard, snapshot, machine->use_scsi,
>                     IF_SD, 0, SD_OPTS);
>
> -    register_savevm_live(NULL, "ram", 0, 4, NULL, ram_save_live, NULL,
> -                         ram_load, NULL);
> +    if (!xen_enabled()) {
> +        register_savevm_live(NULL, "ram", 0, 4, NULL, ram_save_live, NULL,
> +                             ram_load, NULL);
> +    }

Why don't you just unregister the section in the xen initialization code?  That 
way we don't have xen_enabled()'s sprinkled all over the place.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>
>       if (nb_numa_nodes>  0) {
>           int i;