xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3 of 3] KEXEC: Allocate crash structures in low memory
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 11:58:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F02ED82.9080907@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EFEBBDD020000780007C25E@nat28.tlf.novell.com>

On 31/12/11 07:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> 12/31/11 1:12 AM >>>
>> The register contents of the pcpus which were running will be available
>> in the PR_STATUS notes which are also deliberately allocated in low
>> memory by this patch.  To the best of my understanding; to get to the
>> dom0 vcpu state, the crashkernel needs access to the domain structs and
>> vcpu structs (which I believe are actually allocated below 4GiB) and the
> The vCPU ones are, while the domain one isn't.

Right - that is useful to know.

>> Xen page tables which dom0 uses (which inspecting CR3 from the crash
>> notes is certainly not in lower memory).  I suspect that there is also
>> more which needs to be allocated in lower memory to get a full register
>> dump, stack dump, stack trace etc.
>>
>> The plan is to also have the "all" option from the command line which
>> will also allocate the page tables (and other structures where relevant)
>> in lower memory, but this is rather more of an overhead than just the
>> console ring and crash notes, which will have a more visible impact to
>> customers running 32bit PV guests.  This is the reason for separating
>> the two via a command line argument.
> I'm wondering whether, with much less impact on existing code, and as
> already pointed out, restricting the allocation range of
> alloc_xenheap_pages() (by way of a command line option) wouldn't get
> you what you want.
>
> Jan

Assuming that all relevant structures do in fact get allocated by
alloc_xenheap_pages() (which is probably a safe assumption looking at
the code, but I am not certain) then yes, it would have much less impact
on the existing code.  However, it would have a much bigger impact on
the other memory restricted items.  It might be possible (and perhaps a
good idea when extreme debugging is needed) to have a 3rd command line
option for low_crashinfo= which does this, but I dont like it as the
general solution to this problem.

-- 
Andrew Cooper - Dom0 Kernel Engineer, Citrix XenServer
T: +44 (0)1223 225 900, http://www.citrix.com

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-03 11:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-29 15:51 [PATCH 3 of 3] KEXEC: Allocate crash structures in low memory Jan Beulich
2011-12-30 11:19 ` Tim Deegan
2011-12-31  0:11 ` Andrew Cooper
2011-12-31  7:38   ` Jan Beulich
2012-01-03 11:58     ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-12-22 17:36 [PATCH 0 of 3] KEXEC fixes Andrew Cooper
2011-12-22 17:36 ` [PATCH 3 of 3] KEXEC: Allocate crash structures in low memory Andrew Cooper
2011-12-22 18:09   ` David Vrabel
2011-12-22 18:44     ` Andrew Cooper
2011-12-23  9:09       ` Jan Beulich
2011-12-23  9:06   ` Jan Beulich
2011-12-23 11:59     ` Andrew Cooper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F02ED82.9080907@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).