xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: [xen-devel] create irq failed due to move_cleanup_count always being set
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 11:38:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F043A4A.6060702@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E4ABEE53CC34664FA3F0BD8AEAF50A19A2DF1A@szxeml522-mbx.china.huawei.com>

On 04/01/12 04:37, Liuyongan wrote:
> Hi, all
>    
>     I'm using xen-4.0 to do a test. And when I create a domain, it failed due to create_irq() failure. As only 33 domains were successfully created and destroyed before I got the continuous failures, and the domain just before the failure was properly destroyed(at least destroy_irq() was properly called, which will clear move_in_progress, according to the prink-message). So I can conclude for certain that __assign_irq_vector failed due to move_cleanup_count always being set.

Is it always 33 domains it takes to cause the problem, or does it vary? 
If it varies, then I think you want this patch
http://xenbits.xensource.com/hg/xen-unstable.hg/rev/68b903bb1b01 which
corrects the logic which works out which moved vectors it should clean
up.  Without it, stale irq numbers build up in the per-cpu irq_vector
tables leading to __assign_irq_vector failing with -ENOSPC as it find
find a vector to allocate.

> //this is the normal case when create and destroy domain whose id is 31;
> (XEN) irq.c:1232:d0 bind pirq 79, irq 77, share flag:0
> (XEN) irq.c:1377: dom31: pirq 79, irq 77 force unbind
> (XEN) irq.c:1593: dom31: forcing unbind of pirq 79
> (XEN) irq.c:223, destroy irq 77
>
> //domain id 32 is created and destroyed correctly also.
> (XEN) irq.c:1232:d0 bind pirq 79, irq 77, share flag:0
> (XEN) irq.c:1377: dom32: pirq 79, irq 77 force unbind
> (XEN) irq.c:1593: dom32: forcing unbind of pirq 79
> (XEN) irq.c:223, destroy irq 77
>
> //all the subsequent domain creation failed, below lists only 3 times:
> (XEN) physdev.c:88: dom33: can't create irq for msi!
> (XEN) physdev.c:88: dom34: can't create irq for msi!
> (XEN) physdev.c:88: dom35: can't create irq for msi!
>
>      I think this might be a bug and might have fixed, so I compare my code with 4.1.2 and search the mail list for potential patches. (http://xen.markmail.org/search/?q=move_cleanup_count#query:move_cleanup_count+page:6+mid:fpkrafqbeyiauvhs+state:results) submit a patch which add locks in __assign_irq_vector. Can anybody explain why this lock is needed? Or is there a patch that might fix my bug? Thx.

This patch fixes a problem where IOAPIC line level interrupts cease for
a while.  It has nothing to do with MSI interrupts.  (Also, there are no
locks altered, and xen-4.0-testing seems to have gained an additional
hunk in hvm/vmx code unrelated to the original patch.)

>     Addition message: my board is arch-x86, no domains left when failed to create new ones, create_irq failure lasted one day until I reboot the board, and the irq number allocated is used certainly for a msi dev.
>
> Yong an Liu
> 2012.1.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

-- 
Andrew Cooper - Dom0 Kernel Engineer, Citrix XenServer
T: +44 (0)1223 225 900, http://www.citrix.com

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-04 11:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-04  4:37 [xen-devel] create irq failed due to move_cleanup_count always being set Liuyongan
2012-01-04 11:38 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2012-01-04 11:42   ` Andrew Cooper
     [not found] <mailman.5905.1325711316.12970.xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
2012-01-05  6:13 ` Liuyongan
2012-01-06  6:04   ` Liuyongan
2012-01-06 11:00     ` Andrew Cooper
2012-01-06 11:50       ` Liuyongan
2012-01-06 12:18         ` Andrew Cooper
2012-01-07 10:33           ` Liuyongan
2012-01-09  4:50             ` Liuyongan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F043A4A.6060702@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).