From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Egger Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: kill __u*/__s* integer types Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:16:46 +0100 Message-ID: <4F19855E.6010807@amd.com> References: <4F1974A2.10605@amd.com> <4F1989EF020000780006DFB2@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <4F197F52.7040700@amd.com> <4F198EFE020000780006DFCD@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4F198EFE020000780006DFCD@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Jan Beulich Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 01/20/12 15:57, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 20.01.12 at 15:50, Christoph Egger wrote: >> On 01/20/12 15:36, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>>> On 20.01.12 at 15:05, Christoph Egger wrote: >>>> Kill __u*/__s* integer types and use c99 integer types instead. >>>> Cleanup >>> >>> Was this build-tested for ia64? >> >> No. I don't have such a machine. > > And you don't need to. You can just use a cross tool chain. > >> Can you do that, please? > > I'm trying to avoid having to do (a perhaps massive) cleanup after > a patch like this. > > If you can't/don't want to do the cross build (given that the ARM > bits are sort of ready to be committed, it might be a good idea to > check against those bits too), then please adjust the patch so > that it won't break the build for arches you don't test. I just figured this out: includes which doesn't exist on ia64. So I guess ia64 doesn't build anyway... Christoph -- ---to satisfy European Law for business letters: Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24, 85689 Dornach b. Muenchen Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632