xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: annie li <annie.li@oracle.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Kurt Hackel <Kurt.Hackel@oracle.com>,
	young zhang <young.zhang.free@gmail.com>,
	"Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hvm: Correct RTC time offset update error due to tm->tm_year
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 21:10:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F44E94A.2060209@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1329908701.2880.26.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>


Thanks a lot for your reply, Ian.
I guess there is misunderstanding here, see following,
> The Linux kernel's version of mktime and Xen's version both differ from
> standard C/POSIX defined function (in fact I expect Xen's is derived
> from Linux's). Not least because they take a bunch of values instead of
> a struct tm as arguments (i.e. they take unsigned int year, not
> tm->tm_year).
>   
Yes, Xen's is same as Linux's.
> If you wanted to compare Xen vs. a POSIX compliant mktime you'd probably
> want the libc version. The Xen and Linux mktime()s certainly differ
> substantially from the eglibc one.
>   
Thanks, my original aim is to address an issue in rtc_set_time of 
\xen\arch\x86\hvm\rtc.c. (at least I thought it was, need your 
confirmation :-) )
> I don't think you can expect that the in-kernel mktime necessarily has
> the same interface as POSIX documents, there is certainly no particular
> reason why they should or must (a kernel is not a POSIX environment).
> The comment preceding Xen's mktime makes no mention of offsetting
> anything by 1900 (or anything else) and I believe its implementation is
> consistent with its defined interface.
>   
Yes, the comments does not mention of offsetting anything by 1900, and 
this is the reason why I created the patch.
In \xen\arch\x86\hvm\rtc.c, rtc_set_time call mktime to calculate the 
seconds since 1970/01/01, the input parameters of mktime are required to 
be in normal date format. Such as: year=1980, mon=12, day=31, hour=23, 
min=59, sec=59. (Just like Linux)

However, current xen code has some problem when dealing with 
tm->tm_year, see following,
    tm->tm_year = from_bcd(s, s->hw.cmos_data[RTC_YEAR]) + 100;
    after = mktime(tm->tm_year, tm->tm_mon + 1, tm->tm_mday,
                   tm->tm_hour, tm->tm_min, tm->tm_sec);
(For example, if current time is 2012/12/31, tm->tm_year is 112 here)

To meet the requirement of Xen's mktime, tm->tm_year should be changed 
to tm->tm_year+1900 when calling mktime in Xen. See following,
    after = mktime(tm->tm_year+1900, tm->tm_mon+1, tm->tm_mday,
                   tm->tm_hour, tm->tm_min, tm->tm_sec);

Thanks,
Annie
> Ian.
>
>   
>> See following diff file which is created between mktime of linux and 
>> mktime of xen, (I did some tab/space format changes for comparison)
>>
>> diff linux-mktime.c xen-mktime.c
>> 2,4c2,4
>> < mktime(const unsigned int year0, const unsigned int mon0,
>> <       const unsigned int day, const unsigned int hour,
>> <       const unsigned int min, const unsigned int sec)
>> ---
>>  > mktime (unsigned int year, unsigned int mon,
>>  >       unsigned int day, unsigned int hour,
>>  >       unsigned int min, unsigned int sec)
>> 6,8c6
>> <       unsigned int mon = mon0, year = year0;
>> <
>> <       /* 1..12 -> 11,12,1..10 */
>> ---
>>  >       /* 1..12 -> 11,12,1..10: put Feb last since it has a leap day. */
>> 10c8
>> <               mon += 12;      /* Puts Feb last since it has leap day */
>> ---
>>  >               mon += 12;
>> 21d18
>> <
>>
>> Thanks
>> Annie
>>     
>>> best regards
>>> yang
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>     
>
>
>   

  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-22 13:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-20  7:19 [PATCH] hvm: Correct RTC time offset update error due to tm->tm_year ANNIE LI
2012-02-20 14:53 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2012-02-20 15:04   ` young zhang
2012-02-20 23:54     ` Zhang, Yang Z
2012-02-21  2:31       ` ANNIE LI
2012-02-22 11:05         ` Ian Campbell
2012-02-22 13:10           ` annie li [this message]
2012-02-22 13:58             ` Ian Campbell
2012-02-22 14:35               ` annie li
2012-02-23 14:52               ` annie li
2012-02-23 15:17                 ` annie li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F44E94A.2060209@oracle.com \
    --to=annie.li@oracle.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=Kurt.Hackel@oracle.com \
    --cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    --cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=young.zhang.free@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).