xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] KEXEC: Allocate crash notes on boot
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:08:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F5A2AF7.2090904@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F5A32AA020000780007764F@nat28.tlf.novell.com>

On 09/03/12 15:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 09.03.12 at 15:42, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> +static int __init kexec_init(void)
>> +{
>> +    void *cpu = (void *)(unsigned long)smp_processor_id();
>> +
>> +    /* If no crash area, no need to allocate space for notes. */
>> +    if ( !kexec_crash_area.size )
>> +        return 0;
>> +
>> +    register_keyhandler('C', &crashdump_trigger_keyhandler);
> Wouldn't this better be done only after successful crash_notes
> allocation below?

Yes

>> +
>> +    crash_notes = xmalloc_array(crash_note_range_t, nr_cpu_ids);
>> +    if ( ! crash_notes )
>> +        return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +    memset(crash_notes, 0, sizeof(crash_note_range_t) * nr_cpu_ids);
> Using xzalloc_array() above would be preferred.
>

Doh! I started this patch against unstable, with xzalloc, then ported to
4.1 without xzalloc, then ported back to unstable and forgot to change.

I will respin it

>> +
>> +    cpu_callback(&cpu_nfb, CPU_UP_PREPARE, cpu);
>> +    register_cpu_notifier(&cpu_nfb);
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
> Looks okay otherwise, but I'm still not fully convinced all this is really
> needed.
>
> Jan
>

-- 
Andrew Cooper - Dom0 Kernel Engineer, Citrix XenServer
T: +44 (0)1223 225 900, http://www.citrix.com

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-09 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-09 14:42 [PATCH 0 of 4] KEXEC subsystem fixes and changes Andrew Cooper
2012-03-09 14:42 ` [PATCH 1 of 4] KEXEC: Allocate crash notes on boot Andrew Cooper
2012-03-09 15:41   ` Jan Beulich
2012-03-09 16:08     ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2012-03-09 16:58       ` Jan Beulich
2012-03-09 14:42 ` [PATCH 2 of 4] x86: Introduce "top_of_mem" Andrew Cooper
2012-03-09 15:43   ` Jan Beulich
2012-03-09 16:46     ` Andrew Cooper
2012-03-09 17:00       ` Jan Beulich
2012-03-09 14:42 ` [PATCH 3 of 4] KEXEC: Allocate crash structures in low memory Andrew Cooper
2012-03-09 15:52   ` Keir Fraser
2012-03-09 16:24     ` Andrew Cooper
2012-03-09 16:30       ` Keir Fraser
2012-03-09 15:55   ` Jan Beulich
2012-03-09 17:01     ` Andrew Cooper
2012-03-09 14:42 ` [PATCH 4 of 4] KEXEC: Introduce new crashtables interface Andrew Cooper
2012-03-09 16:11   ` Jan Beulich
2012-03-09 17:33     ` Andrew Cooper
2012-03-11  9:59       ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F5A2AF7.2090904@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).