From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] KEXEC: Allocate crash notes on boot
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:08:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F5A2AF7.2090904@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F5A32AA020000780007764F@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 09/03/12 15:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 09.03.12 at 15:42, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> +static int __init kexec_init(void)
>> +{
>> + void *cpu = (void *)(unsigned long)smp_processor_id();
>> +
>> + /* If no crash area, no need to allocate space for notes. */
>> + if ( !kexec_crash_area.size )
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + register_keyhandler('C', &crashdump_trigger_keyhandler);
> Wouldn't this better be done only after successful crash_notes
> allocation below?
Yes
>> +
>> + crash_notes = xmalloc_array(crash_note_range_t, nr_cpu_ids);
>> + if ( ! crash_notes )
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + memset(crash_notes, 0, sizeof(crash_note_range_t) * nr_cpu_ids);
> Using xzalloc_array() above would be preferred.
>
Doh! I started this patch against unstable, with xzalloc, then ported to
4.1 without xzalloc, then ported back to unstable and forgot to change.
I will respin it
>> +
>> + cpu_callback(&cpu_nfb, CPU_UP_PREPARE, cpu);
>> + register_cpu_notifier(&cpu_nfb);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
> Looks okay otherwise, but I'm still not fully convinced all this is really
> needed.
>
> Jan
>
--
Andrew Cooper - Dom0 Kernel Engineer, Citrix XenServer
T: +44 (0)1223 225 900, http://www.citrix.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-09 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-09 14:42 [PATCH 0 of 4] KEXEC subsystem fixes and changes Andrew Cooper
2012-03-09 14:42 ` [PATCH 1 of 4] KEXEC: Allocate crash notes on boot Andrew Cooper
2012-03-09 15:41 ` Jan Beulich
2012-03-09 16:08 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2012-03-09 16:58 ` Jan Beulich
2012-03-09 14:42 ` [PATCH 2 of 4] x86: Introduce "top_of_mem" Andrew Cooper
2012-03-09 15:43 ` Jan Beulich
2012-03-09 16:46 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-03-09 17:00 ` Jan Beulich
2012-03-09 14:42 ` [PATCH 3 of 4] KEXEC: Allocate crash structures in low memory Andrew Cooper
2012-03-09 15:52 ` Keir Fraser
2012-03-09 16:24 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-03-09 16:30 ` Keir Fraser
2012-03-09 15:55 ` Jan Beulich
2012-03-09 17:01 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-03-09 14:42 ` [PATCH 4 of 4] KEXEC: Introduce new crashtables interface Andrew Cooper
2012-03-09 16:11 ` Jan Beulich
2012-03-09 17:33 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-03-11 9:59 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F5A2AF7.2090904@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).