xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
To: Attilio Rao <attilio.rao@citrix.com>
Cc: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@entel.upc.edu>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	"Ian Jackson" <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
	"Ian Campbell" <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [PATCH v3] Fetch the OVMF repository from specific git mirror and enable it
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 11:06:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F6856B8.7080300@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F6771F4.1060607@citrix.com>

On 03/19/12 18:50, Attilio Rao wrote:
> On 19/03/12 17:40, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> On 19/03/12 16:36, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> Attilio Rao writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [PATCH v3] Fetch the
>>> OVMF repository from specific git mirror and enable it"):
>>>> I think I see the issue here. Are you running with i486 as an arch?
>>>> This is a deficiency of the OVMF support, because it has some wrappers
>>>> to build appropriately the firmware which are OS and architectures
>>>> specific and it does support Linux-i686 and Linux-x86_64 but not
>>>> Linux-i486.
>>>> I'm not sure about what we should do here, possible options include:
>>>> - Verify that, on all i486,i586,etc. we can eventually use i686 and
>>>> unify the script to do that
>>> Surely it's just wanting to know roughly what architecture to build
>>> for. The difference between i686 and i486 isn't relevant here.
>>> (I hope. If it is then we have other problems because this is tested
>>> at build-time and might be run on a different kernel to the one it's
>>> built on.)
>>>
>>> So I think this is the right thing to do.
>>>
>>
>> Here is my take on OVMF for what is needed:
>> http://xenbits.xen.org/people/attilio/ovmf-xen-arches.patch
>> <http://xenbits.xen.org/people/attilio/ovmf-xen-arches.patch>
>>
>> This should at least fix tianocore to build on all i*86 Linux flavours.
>> Unfortunately I don't have a NetBSD machine to test it out, so if
>> Christoph and/or Roger can apply this patch to ovmf and try the
>> original patch on this thread (and verify NetBSD can build ok) I'll
>> propose this patch upstream for TIANOCORE, otherwise I will just send
>> out a patch with OVMF disabled until NetBSD is not tested.
>>
>
> To be more precise, you don't even need the patch at the beginning of
> the thread, all you need to do to test you can build OVMF on NetBSD is:
> - git clone git://xenbits.xen.org/ovmf.git
> - apply the patch above
> - cd ovmf/OvmfPkg/
> - $ ./build.sh
> - $ ./build.sh -a X64

The build fails that build.sh is a bash-script and not a /bin/sh script.

Christoph


-- 
---to satisfy European Law for business letters:
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85689 Dornach b. Muenchen
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd
Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen
Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-20 10:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-01 19:28 [PATCH] [PATCH v3] Fetch the OVMF repository from specific git mirror and enable it Attilio Rao
2012-03-14 12:08 ` Ian Jackson
2012-03-14 13:14   ` Attilio Rao
2012-03-17 22:33   ` Attilio Rao
2012-03-19 16:36     ` Ian Jackson
2012-03-19 17:40       ` Attilio Rao
2012-03-19 17:50         ` Attilio Rao
2012-03-20 10:06           ` Christoph Egger [this message]
2012-03-20 10:47             ` Attilio Rao
2012-03-20 11:04               ` Christoph Egger
2012-03-20 11:11                 ` Roger Pau Monné
2012-03-20 11:09             ` Attilio Rao
2012-03-20 11:57               ` Christoph Egger
2012-03-20 12:12                 ` Attilio Rao
2012-03-20 13:52                   ` Christoph Egger
2012-03-20 16:30                     ` Ian Jackson
2012-03-20 16:44                       ` Christoph Egger
2012-03-14 13:10 ` Ian Campbell
2012-03-14 13:14   ` Attilio Rao
2012-03-14 14:11   ` Ian Jackson
2012-03-14 14:21     ` Ian Campbell
2012-03-20 11:16 ` Roger Pau Monné
2012-03-20 11:28   ` Attilio Rao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F6856B8.7080300@amd.com \
    --to=christoph.egger@amd.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=attilio.rao@citrix.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@entel.upc.edu \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).