From: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
To: Attilio Rao <attilio.rao@citrix.com>
Cc: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@entel.upc.edu>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
"Ian Jackson" <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
"Ian Campbell" <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [PATCH v3] Fetch the OVMF repository from specific git mirror and enable it
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 12:57:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F68709E.7060304@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F686579.3050900@citrix.com>
On 03/20/12 12:09, Attilio Rao wrote:
> On 20/03/12 10:06, Christoph Egger wrote:
>> On 03/19/12 18:50, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>> On 19/03/12 17:40, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>>> On 19/03/12 16:36, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>>>> Attilio Rao writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [PATCH v3] Fetch the
>>>>> OVMF repository from specific git mirror and enable it"):
>>>>>> I think I see the issue here. Are you running with i486 as an arch?
>>>>>> This is a deficiency of the OVMF support, because it has some
>>>>>> wrappers
>>>>>> to build appropriately the firmware which are OS and architectures
>>>>>> specific and it does support Linux-i686 and Linux-x86_64 but not
>>>>>> Linux-i486.
>>>>>> I'm not sure about what we should do here, possible options include:
>>>>>> - Verify that, on all i486,i586,etc. we can eventually use i686 and
>>>>>> unify the script to do that
>>>>> Surely it's just wanting to know roughly what architecture to build
>>>>> for. The difference between i686 and i486 isn't relevant here.
>>>>> (I hope. If it is then we have other problems because this is tested
>>>>> at build-time and might be run on a different kernel to the one it's
>>>>> built on.)
>>>>>
>>>>> So I think this is the right thing to do.
>>>>>
>>>> Here is my take on OVMF for what is needed:
>>>> http://xenbits.xen.org/people/attilio/ovmf-xen-arches.patch
>>>> <http://xenbits.xen.org/people/attilio/ovmf-xen-arches.patch>
>>>>
>>>> This should at least fix tianocore to build on all i*86 Linux flavours.
>>>> Unfortunately I don't have a NetBSD machine to test it out, so if
>>>> Christoph and/or Roger can apply this patch to ovmf and try the
>>>> original patch on this thread (and verify NetBSD can build ok) I'll
>>>> propose this patch upstream for TIANOCORE, otherwise I will just send
>>>> out a patch with OVMF disabled until NetBSD is not tested.
>>>>
>>> To be more precise, you don't even need the patch at the beginning of
>>> the thread, all you need to do to test you can build OVMF on NetBSD is:
>>> - git clone git://xenbits.xen.org/ovmf.git
>>> - apply the patch above
>>> - cd ovmf/OvmfPkg/
>>> - $ ./build.sh
>>> - $ ./build.sh -a X64
>> The build fails that build.sh is a bash-script and not a /bin/sh script.
>>
>
> Please forget my previous e-mail.
> I've updated the patch (same link) and I'd be grateful if you can give
> it a try now.
I replaced #!/bin/bash with #!/usr/bin/env bash in the entire tree and
get this:
Initializing workspace
/data/xen-ovmf/ovmf/BaseTools
WORKSPACE: /data/xen-ovmf/ovmf
EDK_TOOLS_PATH: /data/xen-ovmf/ovmf/BaseTools
Copying $EDK_TOOLS_PATH/Conf/build_rule.template
to $WORKSPACE/Conf/build_rule.txt
Copying $EDK_TOOLS_PATH/Conf/FrameworkDatabase.template
to $WORKSPACE/Conf/FrameworkDatabase.txt
Copying $EDK_TOOLS_PATH/Conf/tools_def.template
to $WORKSPACE/Conf/tools_def.txt
Copying $EDK_TOOLS_PATH/Conf/target.template
to $WORKSPACE/Conf/target.txt
Building tools as they are not in the path
SourceCMakefilesNmakeSubdirs.bat: not found
> (Sorry but I really don't have now a NetBSD machine to test on, so I
> cannot really catch even silly mistakes).
Installing NetBSD in a virtual machine is not an option?
Christoph
--
---to satisfy European Law for business letters:
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85689 Dornach b. Muenchen
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd
Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen
Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-20 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-01 19:28 [PATCH] [PATCH v3] Fetch the OVMF repository from specific git mirror and enable it Attilio Rao
2012-03-14 12:08 ` Ian Jackson
2012-03-14 13:14 ` Attilio Rao
2012-03-17 22:33 ` Attilio Rao
2012-03-19 16:36 ` Ian Jackson
2012-03-19 17:40 ` Attilio Rao
2012-03-19 17:50 ` Attilio Rao
2012-03-20 10:06 ` Christoph Egger
2012-03-20 10:47 ` Attilio Rao
2012-03-20 11:04 ` Christoph Egger
2012-03-20 11:11 ` Roger Pau Monné
2012-03-20 11:09 ` Attilio Rao
2012-03-20 11:57 ` Christoph Egger [this message]
2012-03-20 12:12 ` Attilio Rao
2012-03-20 13:52 ` Christoph Egger
2012-03-20 16:30 ` Ian Jackson
2012-03-20 16:44 ` Christoph Egger
2012-03-14 13:10 ` Ian Campbell
2012-03-14 13:14 ` Attilio Rao
2012-03-14 14:11 ` Ian Jackson
2012-03-14 14:21 ` Ian Campbell
2012-03-20 11:16 ` Roger Pau Monné
2012-03-20 11:28 ` Attilio Rao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F68709E.7060304@amd.com \
--to=christoph.egger@amd.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=attilio.rao@citrix.com \
--cc=roger.pau@entel.upc.edu \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).