From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Raghavendra K T Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V6 5/5] Documentation/kvm : Add documentation on Hypercalls and features used for PV spinlock Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:34:38 +0530 Message-ID: <4F997216.6080804@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20120423095937.30893.14776.sendpatchset@codeblue.in.ibm.com> <20120423100034.30893.81866.sendpatchset@codeblue.in.ibm.com> <4F997058.6070509@landley.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4F997058.6070509@landley.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Rob Landley Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , X86 , KVM , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Virtualization , Ingo Molnar , Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Avi Kivity , "H. Peter Anvin" , Xen , Stefano Stabellini , Sasha Levin List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 04/26/2012 09:27 PM, Rob Landley wrote: > On 04/23/2012 05:00 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote: >> From: Raghavendra K T > ... >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt >> @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ >> +KVM Hypercalls Documentation >> +=========================== >> +Template for documentation is >> +The documenenation for hypercalls should inlcude > > What does the line about templates mean/ > > documenenation? inlcude? I think I should correct some redundant statements here. The template is meant for current "structure / layout of hypercall documentation". > >> +1. Hypercall name, value. >> +2. Architecture(s) >> +3. status (deprecated, obsolete, active) >> +4. Purpose >> + >> + >> +1. KVM_HC_VAPIC_POLL_IRQ >> +------------------------ >> +value: 1 >> +Architecture: x86 >> +Purpose: > > Purpose: none. > Will add this when I respin the patch soon > Rob Thanks for review.