xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "Keir (Xen.org)" <keir@xen.org>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: kexec: Clear notes during setup
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 16:39:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FA3F830.1050304@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FA410F00200007800081B86@nat28.tlf.novell.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2013 bytes --]

On 04/05/12 16:25, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 04.05.12 at 17:19, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> On 04/05/12 13:51, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 04.05.12 at 13:42, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>> I know that xen-unstable is on a feature freeze, and this is not
>>>> strictly a bugfix (yet; see below), but as it is safe and designed to
>>>> help clarity in the case of a crash, so I request that it be considered
>>>> for inclusion.
>>>>
>>>> I have constructed an artificial case where the information reported in
>>>> 1 per-cpu crash note was stale by using low_crashinfo mode, crashing
>>>> Xen, allowing it to reboot, offlining a CPU then re-crashing Xen.  This
>>>> leaves stale register state written into the offlined CPU crash
>>>> information.  In this case, the information was stale but correct, due
>>>> to the predictable nature of the Xen crash path from the 'C' debug key,
>>>> but there is no guarantee that in the case of a real crash, the same
>>>> will still be true.
>>> Apart from the missing blanks in the for() statement (which could as
>>> well be a simple memset() afaict),
>>> Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
>>>
>>> I personally would think that this can go in as a bug fix.
>>>
>>> Jan
>> How would you format the for loop differently? (Not that I mind - just
>> so I know for next time)
>         for ( i = 0; i < (crash_heap_size >> PAGE_SHIFT); ++i )

Ok - refreshed the patch as such

>
>> As for clear_page vs memset - clear_page is faster, and liable to be
>> conditionally tuned more in the future.
> Certainly, but does this matter here?
>
> Jan
>

crash_heap_size scales linearly with the number of PCPUs on the system,
so very large boxes might start noticing a difference in boot speed. 
(Probably not in the grand scheme of things, but as we are explicitly
allocating pages, it makes sense to clear them as pages)

-- 
Andrew Cooper - Dom0 Kernel Engineer, Citrix XenServer
T: +44 (0)1223 225 900, http://www.citrix.com


[-- Attachment #2: kexec-clear-notes.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1505 bytes --]

# HG changeset patch
# Parent 98fe3b2a572d4ffe704124e75c7aa8d94dbb51bc
kexec: clear notes during setup

Explicity zero the memory backing the crash notes during setup.

This allows the crash environment to be rather more certain whether the crash
notes were actually written, rather than trusting that the memory was clear
beforehand.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>

diff -r 98fe3b2a572d xen/common/kexec.c
--- a/xen/common/kexec.c
+++ b/xen/common/kexec.c
@@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ static int kexec_init_cpu_notes(const un
 
     /* If we dont care about the position of allocation, malloc. */
     if ( low_crashinfo_mode == LOW_CRASHINFO_NONE )
-        note = xmalloc_bytes(nr_bytes);
+        note = xzalloc_bytes(nr_bytes);
 
     /* Protect the write into crash_notes[] with a spinlock, as this function
      * is on a hotplug path and a hypercall path. */
@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ static int __init kexec_init(void)
 
     if ( low_crashinfo_mode > LOW_CRASHINFO_NONE )
     {
-        size_t crash_heap_size;
+        size_t crash_heap_size, i;
 
         /* This calculation is safe even if the machine is booted in
          * uniprocessor mode. */
@@ -520,6 +520,9 @@ static int __init kexec_init(void)
         if ( ! crash_heap_current )
             return -ENOMEM;
 
+        for ( i = 0; i < (crash_heap_size >> PAGE_SHIFT); ++i )
+            clear_page(crash_heap_current + (i << PAGE_SHIFT));
+
         crash_heap_end = crash_heap_current + crash_heap_size;
     }
 

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-04 15:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-04 11:42 kexec: Clear notes during setup Andrew Cooper
2012-05-04 12:51 ` Jan Beulich
2012-05-04 15:19   ` Andrew Cooper
2012-05-04 15:25     ` Jan Beulich
2012-05-04 15:39       ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2012-05-04 16:01         ` David Vrabel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FA3F830.1050304@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).