From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
"Keir (Xen.org)" <keir@xen.org>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>
Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 11946: regressions - FAIL
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 16:51:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FA7EF83.3030902@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FA7FE2C02000078000820A6@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 07/05/2012 15:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 07.05.12 at 16:41, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> It appears we have two functions to dump the IO-APIC state:
>> __print_IO_APIC() which gets called on boot and from 'z', and
>> dump_ioapic_irq_info() which gets called from the end of 'i'. These
>> should probably be consolidated somehow.
> Rather not - 'z' provides information on the IO-APIC that isn't
> directly related to specific interrupts, while 'i' (when it comes to
> the IO-APIC) is exclusively interested in the RTEs. Unless
> dump_ioapic_irq_info() is _fully_ redundant with 'z' (didn't check
> in detail yet), in which case I'd vote for removing this function.
>
> Jan
>
dump_ioapic_irq_info() loops through nr_irqs_gsi and uses irq_2_pin to
work out which io-apic RTE to read and decode.
__print_IO_APIC() loop through nr_ioapics, then through each RTE and
decodes it. At the end, it loops through nr_irqs_gsi and matches irqs
to ioapic:pin pairs.
So they are probably different enough to be worth keeping.
~Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-07 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-13 20:16 [xen-unstable test] 11946: regressions - FAIL xen.org
2012-02-14 10:44 ` Ian Campbell
2012-02-14 19:17 ` Daniel De Graaf
2012-03-27 10:36 ` Ian Campbell
2012-03-27 10:52 ` Jan Beulich
2012-05-04 19:48 ` AP
2012-05-04 20:11 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-05-05 0:21 ` AP
2012-05-05 11:04 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-05-05 18:41 ` AP
2012-05-05 19:06 ` AP
2012-05-07 8:10 ` Jan Beulich
2012-05-07 11:50 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-05-07 13:34 ` Jan Beulich
2012-05-07 14:41 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-05-07 14:50 ` Jan Beulich
2012-05-07 15:40 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-05-07 15:43 ` Jan Beulich
2012-05-07 14:54 ` Jan Beulich
2012-05-07 15:51 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2012-05-07 18:29 ` AP
2012-05-08 6:37 ` Jan Beulich
2012-05-05 10:33 ` Ian Campbell
2012-05-05 11:11 ` Andrew Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FA7EF83.3030902@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).