From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] First release candidates for Xen 4.0.4 and 4.1.3 Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 20:10:39 +0100 Message-ID: <4FAAC12F.8010507@citrix.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 09/05/12 20:03, M A Young wrote: > On Tue, 8 May 2012, Keir Fraser wrote: > >> Thanks. The same appears to be true in xen-unstable also. Is the solution to >> simply remove -O0 from the command line? We can test that out in >> xen-unstable if so, and backport if it causes no problems. > I got it to build with the attached patch - > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4063767 . > > It seems the -O0 option was masking some other compile issues so I had to > add -Wno-error=unused-result -Wno-error=array-bounds as well though I > imagine the right solution would be to fix the code so it doesn't give > warnings (if they haven't already been fixed in xen-unstable). > > Michael Young If it is failing -Warray-bounds then the source code probably needs fixing. Do you have a log of the failures caused by -Warray-bounds ? -- Andrew Cooper - Dom0 Kernel Engineer, Citrix XenServer T: +44 (0)1223 225 900, http://www.citrix.com