From: Andreas Kinzler <ml-xen-devel@hfp.de>
To: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: Poor performance with Linux 3.x as dom0
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 18:39:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB67B5C.9070003@hfp.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1336042317.20716.40.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
On 03.05.2012 12:51, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 11:43 +0100, Andreas Kinzler wrote:
>> On 02.05.2012 15:31, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> Did you happen to also compare 3.2.12 and 2.6.34.10 running these
>>> workloads natively?
>> Yes, I tested against 2.6.32.x. Differences exist, but are minor.
>
> Good to know, thanks for testing
>
> The other potential Xen perf thing which just occurred to to me is the
> ACPI power management stuff which the xen-acpi-processor patches in
> 3.4-rcN are fixing. These are necessary to enable things like turbo mode
> so have a pretty large perf impact.
>
> Are you able to try the latest 3.4-rc kernel?
Yes, meanwhile I tried 3.4-rc7. There is some improvement but still a good bit away from
2.6.34 xenified:
time emerge apache:
3.2.12-dom0 3.3.4-dom0 (w. patch) 3.4.0-rc7 2.6.34.10-dom0
real 1m0.560s 0m59.971s (0m58.029s) 0m55.000s 0m47.689s
user 0m40.939s 0m40.619s (0m40.291s) 0m37.846s 0m41.355s
sys 0m18.865s 0m18.305s (0m16.837s) 0m16.041s 0m11.441s
time make -j4 (3.2.12 linux compile):
3.2.12-dom0 3.3.4-dom0 (w. patch) 3.4.0-rc7 2.6.34.10-dom0
real 5m8.793s 5m4.888s (5m1.408s) 4m48.839s 4m20.576s
user 8m1.746s 7m59.726s (7m57.534s) 7m40.129s 7m10.375s
sys 1m39.010s 1m32.994s (1m29.518s) 1m20.993s 0m56.304s
Regards Andreas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-18 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-02 13:11 Poor performance with Linux 3.x as dom0 Andreas Kinzler
2012-05-02 13:30 ` David Vrabel
2012-05-02 17:01 ` Andreas Kinzler
2012-05-03 8:32 ` George Dunlap
2012-05-03 10:46 ` Andreas Kinzler
2012-05-02 13:31 ` Ian Campbell
2012-05-03 10:43 ` Andreas Kinzler
2012-05-03 10:51 ` Ian Campbell
2012-05-07 19:48 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-18 16:39 ` Andreas Kinzler [this message]
2012-05-03 11:33 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-05-03 11:31 ` Stefano Stabellini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FB67B5C.9070003@hfp.de \
--to=ml-xen-devel@hfp.de \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).