From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: prevent call to xfree() in dump_irqs() while in an irq context
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 14:59:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FBA4A48.4010004@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FBA64420200007800084D93@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 21/05/12 14:50, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Because of c/s 24707:96987c324a4f, dump_irqs() can now be called in an
> irq context when a bug condition is encountered. If this is the case,
> ignore the call to xsm_show_irq_ssid() and the subsequent call to
> xfree().
>
> This prevents an assertion failure in xfree(), and should allow all the
> debug information to be dumped, before failing with a BUG() because of
> the underlying race condition we are attempting to reproduce.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
>
> Rather than using the non-obvious conditional around an xfree() that
> would be passed NULL only in the inverse case (which could easily get
> removed by a future change on the basis that calling xfree(NULL) is
> benign), switch the order of checks in xfree() itself and only suppress
> the call to XSM that could potentially call xmalloc().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
>
> --- 2012-04-23.orig/xen/arch/x86/irq.c 2012-05-14 17:43:58.000000000 +0200
> +++ 2012-04-23/xen/arch/x86/irq.c 2012-05-21 15:38:01.000000000 +0200
> @@ -2060,7 +2060,7 @@ static void dump_irqs(unsigned char key)
> if ( !irq_desc_initialized(desc) || desc->handler == &no_irq_type )
> continue;
>
> - ssid = xsm_show_irq_sid(irq);
> + ssid = in_irq() ? NULL : xsm_show_irq_sid(irq);
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
>
> --- 2012-04-23.orig/xen/common/xmalloc_tlsf.c 2011-10-17 08:35:00.000000000 +0200
> +++ 2012-04-23/xen/common/xmalloc_tlsf.c 2012-05-21 15:38:31.000000000 +0200
> @@ -604,11 +604,11 @@ void xfree(void *p)
> {
> struct bhdr *b;
>
> - ASSERT(!in_irq());
> -
> if ( p == NULL )
> return;
>
> + ASSERT(!in_irq());
> +
> /* Strip alignment padding. */
> b = (struct bhdr *)((char *) p - BHDR_OVERHEAD);
> if ( b->size & 1 )
>
>
>
--
Andrew Cooper - Dom0 Kernel Engineer, Citrix XenServer
T: +44 (0)1223 225 900, http://www.citrix.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-21 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-21 13:50 [PATCH] x86: prevent call to xfree() in dump_irqs() while in an irq context Jan Beulich
2012-05-21 13:59 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2012-05-21 15:06 ` Keir Fraser
2012-05-22 8:05 ` Jan Beulich
2012-05-22 14:09 ` Keir Fraser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FBA4A48.4010004@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).