From: Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
keir@xen.org, Ben Guthro <ben@guthro.net>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: dump with xen-unstable & linux 3.2.17
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 13:00:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FBCC366.1060908@ts.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FBCCC650200007800085694@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 05/23/2012 11:39 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 22.05.12 at 23:00, Ben Guthro<ben@guthro.net> wrote:
>> I've bisected this to the following commit in the xen-unstable git tree.
>>
>> I'll be able to dive in a little deeper tomorrow.
>> If you see anything here that looks suspicious to the crash
>> referenced... let me know.
> As the change was really a re-write of a submission by Jürgen,
> I'm adding him to Cc.
>
> Unless he has an immediate idea, we definitely want to
> understand why "cpus" is empty - hence we'd want to see
> *online, *vc->cpu_affinity, vc->cpu_id, and maybe
> vc->processor. (Printing them is probably not a good idea
> here, so I'd instead suggest just copying them to [additional]
> on-stack variables, making sure the compiler doesn't optimize
> them away.)
>
> Probably it would be good to also know what each active
> vCPU's ->cpu_affinity was right before suspend and/or right
> after resume (perhaps in freeze_domains() and/or
> thaw_domains(). That way we'd at least know whether the
> affinity - despite the offending changeset's inverse intention -
> did get changed during the resume process.
No idea, sorry.
I tested the patch only against a problem with power_off, so I never hit the
resume path.
Juergen
--
Juergen Gross Principal Developer Operating Systems
PDG ES&S SWE OS6 Telephone: +49 (0) 89 3222 2967
Fujitsu Technology Solutions e-mail: juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com
Domagkstr. 28 Internet: ts.fujitsu.com
D-80807 Muenchen Company details: ts.fujitsu.com/imprint.html
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-23 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-17 21:20 dump with xen-unstable & linux 3.2.17 Ben Guthro
2012-05-21 14:55 ` Jan Beulich
2012-05-21 19:12 ` Ben Guthro
2012-05-21 19:49 ` Ben Guthro
2012-05-22 15:38 ` Ben Guthro
2012-05-22 16:08 ` Jan Beulich
2012-05-22 16:21 ` Ben Guthro
2012-05-22 17:34 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-22 17:55 ` Ben Guthro
2012-05-22 18:00 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-22 18:26 ` Ben Guthro
2012-05-22 21:00 ` Ben Guthro
2012-05-23 9:39 ` Jan Beulich
2012-05-23 11:00 ` Juergen Gross [this message]
2012-05-25 13:20 ` Ben Guthro
2012-05-31 15:52 ` Ben Guthro
2012-05-31 16:06 ` Jan Beulich
2012-05-31 16:18 ` Ben Guthro
2012-06-01 6:54 ` Dietmar Hahn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FBCC366.1060908@ts.fujitsu.com \
--to=juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=ben@guthro.net \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).