xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: x86_64: Fix double fault stack setup
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 19:15:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FBE7AB2.3070408@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CBE436D3.342EC%keir.xen@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1010 bytes --]

On 24/05/12 19:04, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 24/05/2012 16:28, "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>> Ah yes - how silly of me.  I misread the manual when checking that fact,
>> but this was an INT 08 experiment.  I really should have checked with a
>> ud2 as well.
>>
>> That is a bit awkward.
>>
>> Do we actually care about this error from an INT 08?  I suppose we could
>> check under rip for 0xcd 0x08, but then the same argument would apply to
>> all other exceptions which may push an error onto the stack.
>>
>> Do we care however that entry_vector is not being set correctly?  I cant
>> see anything on the current codepath which uses it, but it doesn't
>> preclude someone adding code in the future.
> It would be a simple one-line patch and make that entry point consistent
> with all other exception-handling entry points. So I'm in favour of it.
>
>  -- Keir

Ok - attached.

-- 
Andrew Cooper - Dom0 Kernel Engineer, Citrix XenServer
T: +44 (0)1223 225 900, http://www.citrix.com


[-- Attachment #2: x86_64-double-fault-entry-vector.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 514 bytes --]

# HG changeset patch
# Parent 69c3ae25bb1ddcb0ea44b7566d36d34e9d6a70aa
x86_64: Record entry vector for double faults.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>

diff -r 69c3ae25bb1d xen/arch/x86/x86_64/entry.S
--- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/entry.S
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/entry.S
@@ -595,6 +595,7 @@ ENTRY(spurious_interrupt_bug)
         jmp   handle_exception
 
 ENTRY(double_fault)
+        movl $TRAP_double_fault,4(%rsp)
         SAVE_ALL
         movq  %rsp,%rdi
         call  do_double_fault

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

      reply	other threads:[~2012-05-24 18:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-24 14:59 x86_64: Fix double fault stack setup Andrew Cooper
2012-05-24 15:14 ` Jan Beulich
2012-05-24 15:28   ` Andrew Cooper
2012-05-24 15:46     ` Jan Beulich
2012-05-24 16:12       ` Andrew Cooper
2012-05-25 10:35         ` Jan Beulich
2012-05-25 11:04           ` Keir Fraser
2012-05-24 18:04     ` Keir Fraser
2012-05-24 18:15       ` Andrew Cooper [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FBE7AB2.3070408@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=keir.xen@gmail.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).