From: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-staging] [xen-unstable] autoconf: check for dev86 and iasl on x86* only
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 14:38:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FBF8B49.1080003@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1337949759.22311.33.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 17:33 +0100, Xen patchbot-unstable wrote:
>> # HG changeset patch
>> # User Roger Pau Monne<roger.pau@citrix.com>
>> # Date 1337008959 -3600
>> # Node ID dfe39bd65137a97d18f0ee7d155d3755ae5530b4
>> # Parent 49ce39c88aeeb0ba58e4f0e2bf865f6981f6e99d
>> autoconf: check for dev86 and iasl on x86* only
>>
>> Check for this tools on x86 systems only.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monne<roger.pau@citrix.com>
>> Acked-by: Ian Jackson<ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
>> Committed-by: Ian Jackson<ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
>> ---
>>
>>
>> diff -r 49ce39c88aee -r dfe39bd65137 tools/configure
>> --- a/tools/configure Mon May 14 16:20:33 2012 +0100
>> +++ b/tools/configure Mon May 14 16:22:39 2012 +0100
>> @@ -2622,9 +2622,14 @@ LDFLAGS="$PREPEND_LDFLAGS $LDFLAGS $APPE
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> -
>> -
>> +case "$host_cpu" in
>> +i[3456]86|x86_64)
>> +
>> +
>> +
>> +
>> + ;;
>> +esac
>
> This seems like a strange result from the change below, or is XC_ARG_VAR
> weird in some way? On ARM I still see the configure option:
> ianc@army:xen-unstable$ ./configure --help | grep iasl
> IASL Path to iasl tool
> ianc@army:xen-unstable$ uname -m
> armv7l
>
> The thing I actually noticed was that we still have
> AX_PATH_PROG_OR_FAIL([AS86], [as86])
> AX_PATH_PROG_OR_FAIL([LD86], [ld86])
> AX_PATH_PROG_OR_FAIL([BCC], [bcc])
> AX_PATH_PROG_OR_FAIL([IASL], [iasl])
>
> Is that expected? I don't think it is... Should these not be the ones
> which are conditional?
It is a conditional, but since the script is the same for all
architectures and arch is not checked when doing a "configure --help",
all the possible options are printed, even those that don't apply to a
system. I will try to check if there's a better way to hide them, but
I'm not sure.
>>
>> # Checks for programs.
>> ac_ext=c
>> diff -r 49ce39c88aee -r dfe39bd65137 tools/configure.ac
>> --- a/tools/configure.ac Mon May 14 16:20:33 2012 +0100
>> +++ b/tools/configure.ac Mon May 14 16:22:39 2012 +0100
>> @@ -67,10 +67,16 @@ AC_ARG_VAR([CURL], [Path to curl-config
>> AC_ARG_VAR([XML], [Path to xml2-config tool])
>> AC_ARG_VAR([BASH], [Path to bash shell])
>> AC_ARG_VAR([XGETTEXT], [Path to xgetttext tool])
>> -AC_ARG_VAR([AS86], [Path to as86 tool])
>> -AC_ARG_VAR([LD86], [Path to ld86 tool])
>> -AC_ARG_VAR([BCC], [Path to bcc tool])
>> -AC_ARG_VAR([IASL], [Path to iasl tool])
>> +
>> +dnl as86, ld86, bcc and iasl are only present in x86* systems
>> +case "$host_cpu" in
>> +i[[3456]]86|x86_64)
>> + AC_ARG_VAR([AS86], [Path to as86 tool])
>> + AC_ARG_VAR([LD86], [Path to ld86 tool])
>> + AC_ARG_VAR([BCC], [Path to bcc tool])
>> + AC_ARG_VAR([IASL], [Path to iasl tool])
>> + ;;
>> +esac
>>
>> # Checks for programs.
>> AC_PROG_CC
>>
I don't know why, but I think my previous patch missed to also make the
actual check conditional, so the applied patch was useless. This should
fix it:
8<----------------------------------------------------------
autoconf: disable dev86 and iasl checks on arm
Run autogen after applying this patch.
Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>
---
tools/configure.ac | 13 +++++++++----
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/configure.ac b/tools/configure.ac
index 706ee13..f7aa9b8 100644
--- a/tools/configure.ac
+++ b/tools/configure.ac
@@ -109,10 +109,15 @@ AS_IF([test "x$pythontools" = "xy"], [
AX_CHECK_PYTHON_DEVEL()
])
AX_PATH_PROG_OR_FAIL([XGETTEXT], [xgettext])
-AX_PATH_PROG_OR_FAIL([AS86], [as86])
-AX_PATH_PROG_OR_FAIL([LD86], [ld86])
-AX_PATH_PROG_OR_FAIL([BCC], [bcc])
-AX_PATH_PROG_OR_FAIL([IASL], [iasl])
+dnl as86, ld86, bcc and iasl are only present in x86* systems
+case "$host_cpu" in
+i[[3456]]86|x86_64)
+ AX_PATH_PROG_OR_FAIL([AS86], [as86])
+ AX_PATH_PROG_OR_FAIL([LD86], [ld86])
+ AX_PATH_PROG_OR_FAIL([BCC], [bcc])
+ AX_PATH_PROG_OR_FAIL([IASL], [iasl])
+ ;;
+esac
AX_CHECK_UUID
AX_CHECK_CURSES
PKG_CHECK_MODULES(glib, glib-2.0)
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-25 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <E1STyDY-0007RL-8b@xenbits.xen.org>
2012-05-25 12:42 ` [Xen-staging] [xen-unstable] autoconf: check for dev86 and iasl on x86* only Ian Campbell
2012-05-25 13:38 ` Roger Pau Monne [this message]
2012-05-25 13:56 ` Ian Campbell
2012-06-18 9:50 ` Roger Pau Monne
2012-07-24 8:28 ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-24 8:36 ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-24 10:53 ` Ian Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FBF8B49.1080003@citrix.com \
--to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).