From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] trace: trace hypercalls inside a multicall Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 17:09:59 +0100 Message-ID: <4FC3A357.6060600@citrix.com> References: <1337855829-15683-1-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com> <1337855829-15683-3-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com> <7CE799CC0E4DE04B88D5FDF226E18AC2CDEB431491@LONPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <7CE799CC0E4DE04B88D5FDF226E18AC2CDEB431491@LONPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Frediano Ziglio Cc: George Dunlap , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 28/05/12 17:03, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 11:37 +0100, David Vrabel wrote: >> From: David Vrabel >> >> Add a trace record for every hypercall inside a multicall. >> >> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel >> --- [...] > Good, I'd personally add a way (subclass perhaps) to exclude such traces > as could be very performance consuming. Yes, that sounds like a good idea. > I'd also add something like sub op (shadow_op or domctl operations have > sub operations which could be useful to understand). Patches welcome! ;) David