xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: yong.zhang0@gmail.com, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	rusty@rustcorp.com.au, rjw@sisk.pl, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 05/27] xen, cpu hotplug: Don't call cpu_bringup() in xen_play_dead()
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 20:43:29 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC8DC19.4000007@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FC8D8E30200007800087D2B@nat28.tlf.novell.com>

On 06/01/2012 06:29 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:

>>>> On 01.06.12 at 11:11, "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> wrote:
>> xen_play_dead calls cpu_bringup() which looks weird, because xen_play_dead()
>> is invoked in the cpu down path, whereas cpu_bringup() (as the name 
>> suggests) is useful in the cpu bringup path.
> 
> This might not be correct - the code as it is without this change is
> safe even when the vCPU gets onlined back later by an external
> entity (e.g. the Xen tool stack), and it would in that case resume
> at the return point of the VCPUOP_down hypercall. That might
> be a heritage from the original XenoLinux tree though, and be
> meaningless in pv-ops context - Jeremy, Konrad?
> 
> Possibly it was bogus/unused even in that original tree - Keir?
>


Thanks for your comments Jan!

In case this change is wrong, the other method I had in mind was to call
cpu_bringup_and_idle() in xen_play_dead(). (Even ARM does something similar,
in the sense that it runs the cpu bringup code including cpu_idle(), in the
cpu offline path, namely the cpu_die() function). Would that approach work
for xen as well? If yes, then we wouldn't have any issues to convert xen to
generic code.

Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat

> 
>> Getting rid of xen_play_dead()'s dependency on cpu_bringup() helps in 
>> hooking on to the generic SMP booting framework.
>>
>> Also remove the extra call to preempt_enable() added by commit 41bd956
>> (xen/smp: Fix CPU online/offline bug triggering a BUG: scheduling while
>> atomic) because it becomes unnecessary after this change.
>>
>> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
>> Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
>> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
>> Cc: x86@kernel.org 
>> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com 
>> Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org 
>> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>
>>  arch/x86/xen/smp.c |    8 --------
>>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
>> index 09a7199..602d6b7 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
>> @@ -417,14 +417,6 @@ static void __cpuinit xen_play_dead(void) /* used only 
>> with HOTPLUG_CPU */
>>  {
>>  	play_dead_common();
>>  	HYPERVISOR_vcpu_op(VCPUOP_down, smp_processor_id(), NULL);
>> -	cpu_bringup();
>> -	/*
>> -	 * Balance out the preempt calls - as we are running in cpu_idle
>> -	 * loop which has been called at bootup from cpu_bringup_and_idle.
>> -	 * The cpucpu_bringup_and_idle called cpu_bringup which made a
>> -	 * preempt_disable() So this preempt_enable will balance it out.
>> -	 */
>> -	preempt_enable();
>>  }
>>  
>>  #else /* !CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
>>
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-01 15:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20120601090952.31979.24799.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
2012-06-01  9:10 ` [PATCH 03/27] smpboot: Define and use cpu_state per-cpu variable in generic code Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-06-01 16:59   ` David Daney
2012-06-01  9:11 ` [PATCH 05/27] xen, cpu hotplug: Don't call cpu_bringup() in xen_play_dead() Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-06-01 12:59   ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2012-06-01 15:13     ` Srivatsa S. Bhat [this message]
2012-06-01 15:36       ` Jan Beulich
2012-06-02 18:06         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-06-05 16:49           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-06-05 17:36             ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-06-05 17:40           ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-05 17:48             ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-06-01  9:11 ` [PATCH 06/27] xen, smpboot: Use generic SMP booting infrastructure Srivatsa S. Bhat

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FC8DC19.4000007@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    --cc=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).