From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/3] trace: improve hypercall tracing Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 17:17:30 +0100 Message-ID: <4FC8EB1A.70608@eu.citrix.com> References: <1338462397-32111-1-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com> <4FC780F1.201@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4FC780F1.201@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: David Vrabel Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 31/05/12 15:32, David Vrabel wrote: > On 31/05/12 15:21, George Dunlap wrote: >> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:06 PM, David Vrabel wrote: >>> These are probably for 4.3. >> Thanks for doing these, David. > Thanks for the review. > >> I wouldn't oppose these going into 4.2; but it is getting awfully >> late. (I acked them "4.2-only" just to flag that up to the >> committers.) > I think they should be for 4.3 -- there's more important things needing > to be merged into 4.2. > >> BTW, what did you use to send these patches? Any chance you could use >> "hg email" (or the git equivalent if you're using git) instead? It >> makes it a lot easier for me to integrate them into my review >> workflow. :-) > I did use git send-email. What's the problem with the series? I can see > if there options I could turn on that would help. Curious. I'm not exactly sure; just that the tool I use to trawl a gmail folder looking for patch series (hg mimport) for some reason identified it as 3 independent patches (and I think put them in the wrong order), rather than a single 3-patch series. Maybe someday I'll take a look and figure out what went wrong. -George