From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH 2 of 2 v3] xl: check for meaningful combination of sedf config file parameters Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 12:11:24 +0100 Message-ID: <4FD1DDDC.6020405@eu.citrix.com> References: <20433.56754.133034.440704@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20433.56754.133034.440704@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson Cc: Juergen Gross , Dario Faggioli , Ian Campbell , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 08/06/12 12:10, Ian Jackson wrote: > Dario Faggioli writes ("[PATCH 2 of 2 v3] xl: check for meaningful combination of sedf config file parameters"): >> As it happens in the implementation of `xl sched-sedf -d ...', some >> consistency checking is needed for the scheduling parameters when >> they come from the config file. > Thanks, I am happy with this from a libxl point of view. I would like > to see an ack from George from a scheduler point of view. I think Dario knows more about what sedf wants than I do; and since it only does anything when the domain is using sedf, I think it's fine. So FWIW: Acked-by: George Dunlap