xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Haxby <john.haxby@oracle.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: Security vulnerability process, and CVE-2012-0217
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 11:04:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF41513.8030408@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1341394035.31696.22.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>

On 04/07/12 10:27, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 19:30 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>> > 
>>>> > > > 8. Predisclosure subscription process, and email address criteria
>> > 
>> > Email is not a trustworthy medium. The linux security list  was in the
>> > past intercepted. 
> I think it would be wise to add encryption (and the requirement to
> provide a key) to the pre-disclosure list. I wonder if mailman has
> per-subscriber encryption capabilities.
>
> If not then we should consider moving this particular list to a list
> manager which can. Apparently whatever the linux-distros list uses can
> do this (judging from
> http://oss-security.openwall.org/wiki/mailing-lists/distros)

That's correct.   linux-distros (and distros) also precludes having
exploder lists in organisations.   That's not generally going to be a
problem -- you're not likely to have more than a handful of people on
the list even in largish organisations.

The linux-distros and distros lists are, I believe, based around
something the list manager maintains.  You'd have to ask him about how
it works.

jch

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-04 10:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-19 18:16 Security vulnerability process, and CVE-2012-0217 Ian Jackson
2012-06-20  8:49 ` Jan Beulich
2012-06-20  9:45   ` George Dunlap
2012-06-20 10:32     ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-02 13:59       ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-02 14:58         ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-02 15:04           ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-02 15:17         ` Alan Cox
2012-07-02 15:20           ` Ian Campbell
2012-06-28 18:30   ` Alan Cox
2012-07-04  9:27     ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-04 10:04       ` John Haxby [this message]
2012-06-29 10:26   ` George Dunlap
2012-06-29 10:41     ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-02 14:00   ` Ian Campbell
2012-06-23 19:42 ` Matt Wilson
2012-06-28 17:45   ` George Dunlap
2012-07-02 13:59     ` Ian Campbell
2012-06-27 18:07 ` Thomas Goirand
2012-06-27 19:14   ` Alan Cox
2012-06-27 19:30   ` Sander Eikelenboom
2012-06-28  9:28   ` Lars Kurth
2012-07-02 13:58     ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-02 14:51       ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-02 14:57         ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-03 22:03     ` Matt Wilson
2012-07-04 10:33       ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-04 11:24       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-04 12:36         ` George Dunlap
2012-07-04 12:52           ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-04 12:56             ` George Dunlap
2012-07-04 13:01               ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-04 13:30               ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-04 14:09                 ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-04 15:09                   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-06 14:36                     ` John Haxby
2012-07-06 16:39                 ` Matthew Allen
2012-07-06 17:24                   ` George Dunlap
2012-06-29 10:01   ` George Dunlap
2012-06-29 15:48     ` Thomas Goirand
2012-07-02 13:59     ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-02 15:13       ` Alan Cox
2012-07-03 11:12       ` George Dunlap
2012-07-03 14:18         ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-23 10:37 ` Ian Campbell
2012-08-23 10:37   ` [PATCH 1/6] Clarify what info predisclosure list members may share during an embargo Ian Campbell
2012-08-23 10:37   ` [PATCH 2/6] Clarifications to predisclosure list subscription instructions Ian Campbell
2012-08-23 10:37   ` [PATCH 3/6] Clarify the scope of the process to just the hypervisor project Ian Campbell
2012-08-23 10:37   ` [PATCH 4/6] Discuss post-embargo disclosure of potentially controversial private decisions Ian Campbell
2012-08-23 10:37   ` [PATCH 5/6] Patch review, expert advice and targetted fixes Ian Campbell
2012-08-23 10:37   ` [PATCH 6/6] Declare version 1.3 Ian Campbell
2012-09-24 11:25   ` Security vulnerability process, and CVE-2012-0217 [vote?] Lars Kurth
2012-10-01 16:38     ` Ian Jackson
2012-10-03 17:03       ` Lars Kurth
2012-10-04  8:39       ` Lars Kurth
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-07-02 15:24 Security vulnerability process, and CVE-2012-0217 John Creol

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FF41513.8030408@oracle.com \
    --to=john.haxby@oracle.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).