From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@amd.com>
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 3 v5/leftover] libxl: enable automatic placement of guests on NUMA nodes [and 1 more messages]
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 20:37:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <500853CE.8090500@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20488.7456.990576.233871@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
On 07/19/2012 04:43 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Andre Przywara writes ("Re: [PATCH 1 of 3 v5/leftover] libxl: enable automatic placement of guests on NUMA nodes [and 1 more messages]"):
>> On 07/18/2012 01:00 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> What is the maximum number of NUMA nodes we might expect to see on a
>>> single system in the next five years? I would argue that 32 is too
>>> optimistic. 128 or 256 seem like more reasonable upper bounds.
>>
>> Wow, what are you talking about?
>> To calm this down from the AMD side:
>> The current Opteron NUMA architecture is limited to exactly 8 nodes.
>> This has ever been the case since the release of Opteron and changing
>> this is not trivial and will not happen in any near future. In general I
>> don't think we will see much bigger NUMA systems, but more cluster like
>> architectures.
>
> One of these `more cluster like architectures', if it has shared
> memory at all, may well end up being most easily represented in the
> model supported by Xen as a NUMA host with a large number of nodes.
>
> We need to plan for the software that we are writing today to work for
> at least the next 5 years /even if we intend to replace the algorithm
> in the next release/. It is very difficult to foresee what might
> happen to hardware in that time.
>
> But it's OK, we don't need to panic. We just need a safety catch
> which stops this algorithm running in situations where it won't work.
> Following a discussion with Dario, AIUI he plans to implement a rule
> that it will bail on systems with more than 8 NUMA nodes.
>
> That is releasable in 4.2 and ought to be satisfactory for you ?
Absolutely, that's fine. I just wanted to make sure that we don't drop
the patches at all because of the theoretical fear of a large NUMA box
lingering somewhere around the corner...
Thanks,
Andre.
--
Andre Przywara
AMD-Operating System Research Center (OSRC), Dresden, Germany
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-19 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-10 15:03 [PATCH 0 of 3 v4/leftover] Automatic NUMA placement for xl Dario Faggioli
2012-07-10 15:03 ` [PATCH 1 of 3 v4/leftover] libxl: enable automatic placement of guests on NUMA nodes Dario Faggioli
2012-07-17 15:55 ` Ian Jackson
2012-07-16 17:13 ` [PATCH 0 of 3 v5/leftover] Automatic NUMA placement for xl Dario Faggioli
2012-07-16 17:13 ` [PATCH 1 of 3 v5/leftover] libxl: enable automatic placement of guests on NUMA nodes Dario Faggioli
2012-07-17 18:04 ` [PATCH 1 of 3 v5/leftover] libxl: enable automatic placement of guests on NUMA nodes [and 1 more messages] Ian Jackson
2012-07-17 20:23 ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-18 0:31 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-18 10:44 ` Ian Jackson
2012-07-18 0:22 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-18 8:27 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-18 9:13 ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-18 9:43 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-18 9:53 ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-18 10:08 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-18 11:00 ` Ian Jackson
2012-07-18 13:14 ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-18 13:35 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-19 12:47 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-18 13:40 ` Andre Przywara
2012-07-18 13:54 ` Juergen Gross
2012-07-18 14:00 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-19 14:43 ` Ian Jackson
2012-07-19 18:37 ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2012-07-21 1:46 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-18 10:53 ` Ian Jackson
2012-07-18 13:12 ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-18 9:47 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-19 12:21 ` [PATCH 1 of 3 v5/leftover] libxl: enable automatic placement of guests on NUMA nodes Andre Przywara
2012-07-19 14:22 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-20 8:19 ` Andre Przywara
2012-07-20 9:39 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-20 10:01 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-20 8:20 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-20 8:26 ` Andre Przywara
2012-07-20 8:38 ` Juergen Gross
2012-07-20 9:52 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-20 9:56 ` Juergen Gross
2012-07-20 9:44 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-20 11:47 ` Andre Przywara
2012-07-20 12:54 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-20 13:07 ` Andre Przywara
2012-07-21 1:44 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-16 17:13 ` [PATCH 2 of 3 v5/leftover] libxl: have NUMA placement deal with cpupools Dario Faggioli
2012-07-16 17:13 ` [PATCH 3 of 3 v5/leftover] Some automatic NUMA placement documentation Dario Faggioli
2012-07-20 11:07 ` [PATCH 0 of 3 v5/leftover] Automatic NUMA placement for xl David Vrabel
2012-07-20 11:43 ` Andre Przywara
2012-07-20 12:00 ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-20 12:08 ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-23 10:38 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-23 10:42 ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-23 15:31 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-23 10:23 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-20 12:14 ` David Vrabel
2012-07-17 15:59 ` [PATCH 1 of 3 v4/leftover] libxl: enable automatic placement of guests on NUMA nodes Ian Campbell
2012-07-17 18:01 ` Ian Jackson
2012-07-17 22:15 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-10 15:03 ` [PATCH 2 of 3 v4/leftover] libxl: have NUMA placement deal with cpupools Dario Faggioli
2012-07-10 15:03 ` [PATCH 3 of 3 v4/leftover] Some automatic NUMA placement documentation Dario Faggioli
2012-07-16 17:03 ` [PATCH 0 of 3 v4/leftover] Automatic NUMA placement for xl Dario Faggioli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=500853CE.8090500@amd.com \
--to=andre.przywara@amd.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com \
--cc=raistlin@linux.it \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).