From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roger Pau Monne Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 18/19] libxl: convert libxl_device_vfb_add to an async operation Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:58:14 +0100 Message-ID: <500D3C56.30208@citrix.com> References: <1342793548-10239-1-git-send-email-roger.pau@citrix.com> <1342793548-10239-19-git-send-email-roger.pau@citrix.com> <20489.40772.556450.864846@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20489.40772.556450.864846@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Ian Jackson wrote: > Roger Pau Monne writes ("[PATCH v10 18/19] libxl: convert libxl_device_vfb_add to an async operation"): >> Split libxl_device_vfb_add into libxl__device_vfb_add (to be used >> inside already running ao's), and make libxl_device_vfb_add a stub >> to call libxl__device_vfb_add. > > If I'm not mistaken this has the effect of newly waiting for vfbs to > enter the correct state on xenstore. Is that intentional ? Yes, libxl waits for vfb to reach state 2 (InitWait), is that ok? > If so it > needs to be explained in the commit message. Ok, I will rework on the commit message. > Aside from that it looks plausible. > > Thanks, > Ian.